Sea lace or Dead man's rope (Chorda filum)
Distribution data supplied by the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS). To interrogate UK data visit the NBN Atlas.Map Help
Researched by | Nicola White | Refereed by | Dr Stefan Kraan |
Authority | (Linnaeus) Stackhouse, 1797 | ||
Other common names | - | Synonyms | Chorda filum (Linnaeus) Stackhouse, 1797 |
Summary
Description
Chorda filum is a brown seaweed with long cord-like fronds, only 5 mm thick in diameter. The fronds are hollow, slippery, unbranched and grow up to 8 m long. The species attaches to the substratum using a small discoid holdfast. It is an annual species, disappearing in winter.
Recorded distribution in Britain and Ireland
All coasts of Britain and Ireland, but rarer in south east England.
Global distribution
Recorded from Canada (Arctic), Alaska, NW Atlantic from Labrador to New Jersey, Greenland, Iceland, Spitsbergen, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands, Belgium, the Baltic, the Faroes, France, Spain, Portugal, Canary Islands, Greece, China, Japan and south Kurile Islands, NE Pacific and the Bering Strait.
Habitat
Found in rock pools on the low shore and in the sublittoral down to 5 m. It is most commonly found in sheltered bays attached to stones and shells, often with the holdfast buried in sand.
Depth range
Less than 20 mIdentifying features
- Frond round in section, cord-like and unbranched.
- Attached by a tiny disc-like holdfast.
- Slimy texture.
- Colourless short hairs on frond in summer.
Additional information
Other common names include mermaid's tresses and cat gut.
Listed by
- none -
Biology review
Taxonomy
Level | Scientific name | Common name |
---|---|---|
Phylum | Ochrophyta | Brown and yellow-green seaweeds |
Class | Phaeophyceae | |
Order | Laminariales | |
Family | Chordaceae | |
Genus | Chorda | |
Authority | (Linnaeus) Stackhouse, 1797 | |
Recent Synonyms | Chorda filum (Linnaeus) Stackhouse, 1797 |
Biology
Parameter | Data | ||
---|---|---|---|
Typical abundance | Moderate density | ||
Male size range | Up to 8 m | ||
Male size at maturity | 36 cm | ||
Female size range | 36 cm | ||
Female size at maturity | |||
Growth form | Filiform / filamentous | ||
Growth rate | 17cm/month | ||
Body flexibility | |||
Mobility | |||
Characteristic feeding method | Autotroph | ||
Diet/food source | |||
Typically feeds on | |||
Sociability | |||
Environmental position | Epifloral | ||
Dependency | Independent. | ||
Supports | No information | ||
Is the species harmful? | No |
Biology information
Chorda filum is a summer annual, falling into decay in the autumn and disappearing during winter. Growth rate is maximal during the summer. The adult frond is a hollow tube, the walls of which are spirally constructed. The frond is frequently inflated with gases in the terminal region. Plants usually grow in clumps. The end of the frond decays continuously and is replaced by growth from a sub-terminal meristem. Hairs are sparse or absent on older plants.
Habitat preferences
Parameter | Data |
---|---|
Physiographic preferences | Enclosed coast or Embayment, Estuary, Isolated saline water (Lagoon), Ria or Voe, Sea loch or Sea lough, Strait or Sound |
Biological zone preferences | Lower infralittoral, Sublittoral fringe, Upper infralittoral |
Substratum / habitat preferences | Gravel / shingle, Macroalgae, Mixed, Muddy gravel, Pebbles |
Tidal strength preferences | Moderately strong 1 to 3 knots (0.5-1.5 m/sec.), Weak < 1 knot (<0.5 m/sec.) |
Wave exposure preferences | Sheltered, Very sheltered |
Salinity preferences | Full (30-40 psu), Low (<18 psu), Reduced (18-30 psu), Variable (18-40 psu) |
Depth range | Less than 20 m |
Other preferences | No text entered |
Migration Pattern | Non-migratory or resident |
Habitat Information
Chorda filum occurs in sheltered bays, estuaries, lagoons and sea lochs. It is rarely found on the open coast and is completely absent from exposed shores. The plants occur in clumps on a range of unstable, small objects such as pebbles and shells. It may also be found on sand and detritus but it will not remain for long on this substratum (S. Kraan, pers. comm.). They are also epiphytic on Zostera marina and Fucus vesiculosus. During stormy weather, plants may be washed to more sheltered locations where they continue development. Chorda filum has considerable tolerance to reduced salinities and extends into river mouths and the Baltic, where it grows at 3.5 psu. However, plants that grow in fully marine conditions cannot withstand immersion in freshwater for two hours (Russell, 1985).
Life history
Adult characteristics
Parameter | Data |
---|---|
Reproductive type | Alternation of generations |
Reproductive frequency | Annual protracted |
Fecundity (number of eggs) | >1,000,000 |
Generation time | <1 year |
Age at maturity | <1 year |
Season | |
Life span | Insufficient information |
Larval characteristics
Parameter | Data |
---|---|
Larval/propagule type | - |
Larval/juvenile development | Spores (sexual / asexual) |
Duration of larval stage | Not relevant |
Larval dispersal potential | 100 -1000 m |
Larval settlement period | Not relevant |
Life history information
Chorda filum has a similar life-history to other Laminariales, exhibiting alternation of heteromorphic generations. The species has a macroscopic diploid sporophyte and a microscopic haploid gametophyte. The gametophytes consist of clumps of prostate, branched, filaments approximately 100 micrometres long. Female gametophytes are less branched than male ones and may be distinguished by their larger more densely pigmented cells. The male gametophytes are smaller, paler in colour and more densely branched than the females. Chorda filum exhibits a protracted reproductive period. Visible sporophytes appear on shores between February and mid-March and develop into secondary sporophytes between April and June. The sporophytes are washed away from October to February, leaving behind zoospores or gametophytes. The size of plants is not related to their state of maturity, although the smallest plants to bear sporangia have been observed to be 36.6 cm long. When the meristem becomes indistinct it is likely that fruiting has begun. During the period of fertility the whole plant except the lowermost 5-10 cm, is covered in unilocular sporangia. Experiments on growing Chorda filum in culture have shown that fruiting appears to be endogenously controlled and occurs irrespective of environmental conditions (South & Burrows, 1967).Sensitivity review
The MarLIN sensitivity assessment approach used below has been superseded by the MarESA (Marine Evidence-based Sensitivity Assessment) approach (see menu). The MarLIN approach was used for assessments from 1999-2010. The MarESA approach reflects the recent conservation imperatives and terminology and is used for sensitivity assessments from 2014 onwards.
Physical pressures
Use / to open/close text displayed
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence / Confidence | |
Substratum loss [Show more]Substratum lossBenchmark. All of the substratum occupied by the species or biotope under consideration is removed. A single event is assumed for sensitivity assessment. Once the activity or event has stopped (or between regular events) suitable substratum remains or is deposited. Species or community recovery assumes that the substratum within the habitat preferences of the original species or community is present. Further details EvidenceChorda filum is permanently attached to the substratum and would be removed with substratum loss. Accordingly, intolerance has been assessed as high. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | High | High | Moderate | Low |
Smothering [Show more]SmotheringBenchmark. All of the population of a species or an area of a biotope is smothered by sediment to a depth of 5 cm above the substratum for one month. Impermeable materials, such as concrete, oil, or tar, are likely to have a greater effect. Further details. EvidenceThe impact of smothering would depend on the time of year when it occurred. If smothering took place in winter, the microscopic gametophytes of Chorda filum would be buried. Although the gametophytes are more than likely to be tolerant of darkness (see turbidity), the reduction in oxygen often associated with smothering may lead to gametophytes rotting. At the very least, it may delay the microscopic gametophytes from germinating. If smothering occurred between April and November, when the large sporophytes are present, the impact would be lessened because some of the fronds would escape burial. Indeed, plants are often found with their holdfasts buried in sand or mud. Overall, intolerance has been assessed as intermediate to reflect the possibility that some gametophytes may be lost which would lead to a reduced population size the following year. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Increase in suspended sediment [Show more]Increase in suspended sedimentBenchmark. An arbitrary short-term, acute change in background suspended sediment concentration e.g., a change of 100 mg/l for one month. The resultant light attenuation effects are addressed under turbidity, and the effects of rapid settling out of suspended sediment are addressed under smothering. Further details EvidenceThe presence of silt on fronds would reduce light available for photosynthesis and lower growth rates. However, the species naturally occurs in places of high siltation, such as estuaries, so the species is likely to be tolerant of this factor. | Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Moderate |
Decrease in suspended sediment [Show more]Decrease in suspended sedimentBenchmark. An arbitrary short-term, acute change in background suspended sediment concentration e.g., a change of 100 mg/l for one month. The resultant light attenuation effects are addressed under turbidity, and the effects of rapid settling out of suspended sediment are addressed under smothering. Further details EvidenceChorda filum is likely to be tolerant of a reduction in suspended sediment and may even benefit from an decrease in light attenuation (see turbidity). | Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Moderate |
Desiccation [Show more]Desiccation
EvidenceChorda filum is likely to be highly intolerant of desiccation since it normally occurs in the shallow sublittoral or in rock pools. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | High | High | Moderate | High |
Increase in emergence regime [Show more]Increase in emergence regimeBenchmark. A one hour change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of one year. Further details EvidenceChorda filum would probably be highly intolerant of an increase emergence because it cannot withstand desiccation. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | High | High | Moderate | Moderate |
Decrease in emergence regime [Show more]Decrease in emergence regimeBenchmark. A one hour change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of one year. Further details EvidenceAt the level of the benchmark Chorda filum is likely to be tolerant* of a decrease in emergence as the extent of the population may increase providing suitable substratum was available. | Tolerant* | Not relevant | Not sensitive* | Low |
Increase in water flow rate [Show more]Increase in water flow rateA change of two categories in water flow rate (view glossary) for 1 year, for example, from moderately strong (1-3 knots) to very weak (negligible). Further details EvidenceAn increase in water flow may cause the substratum, with the plants attached, to be moved. If the substratum is moved to suitable conditions for growth of Chorda filum the plants will survive. However, the plants may be carried away to areas where the conditions are unsuitable for the alga's growth, for example, into areas deeper than the compensation zone for photosynthesis. In this case, the plants would die. An intolerance of intermediate has been suggested to reflect the likelihood that some plants will be lost to unsuitable areas. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | Intermediate | High | Low | Moderate |
Decrease in water flow rate [Show more]Decrease in water flow rateA change of two categories in water flow rate (view glossary) for 1 year, for example, from moderately strong (1-3 knots) to very weak (negligible). Further details EvidenceA decrease in water flow at the benchmark level could result in the plants being in areas with negligible water flow. In this case, the plants would probably die (S. Kraan, pers. comm.) and therefore, intolerance has been assessed as high. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | High | High | Moderate | High |
Increase in temperature [Show more]Increase in temperature
For intertidal species or communities, the range of temperatures includes the air temperature regime for that species or community. Further details EvidenceThe species lives in rock pools, where it is exposed to wide fluctuations in temperature. It occurs from Spitsbergen to northern Portugal and does not appear to form ecotypes that vary in thermal response over its distribution range (Breeman, 1988). It is well within its temperature range in the UK and would probably not be affected by a change in 5 °C. | Low | High | Low | Low |
Decrease in temperature [Show more]Decrease in temperature
For intertidal species or communities, the range of temperatures includes the air temperature regime for that species or community. Further details EvidenceThe species lives in rock pools, where it is exposed to wide fluctuations in temperature. It occurs from Spitsbergen to northern Portugal and does not appear to form ecotypes that vary in thermal response over its distribution range (Breeman, 1988). It is well within its temperature range in the UK and would probably not be affected by a change in 5 °C. | Low | High | Low | Low |
Increase in turbidity [Show more]Increase in turbidity
EvidenceTurbidity would reduce light available for photosynthesis and lower growth rates. It may also reduce the maximum depth at which Chorda filum can grow. However, at the benchmark level it is unlikely that the population would be adversely affected and, therefore, low intolerance has been suggested. On return to normal turbidity levels the growth rate would be quickly restored. | Low | Immediate | Not sensitive | Moderate |
Decrease in turbidity [Show more]Decrease in turbidity
EvidenceA decrease in turbidity may lead to enhanced growth rate as a result of decreased light attenuation. The lower extent of the population may also be extended as the depth of compensation point for photosynthesis may also become deeper. Tolerant* has been suggested. | Tolerant* | Not relevant | Not sensitive* | Not relevant |
Increase in wave exposure [Show more]Increase in wave exposureA change of two ranks on the wave exposure scale (view glossary) e.g., from Exposed to Extremely exposed for a period of one year. Further details EvidenceChorda filum is most common at sheltered sites. An increase in wave exposure above this could tear plants off the substratum or move the substratum with the plants attached. If the substratum was moved to conditions suitable for growth of the algae the species could continue growing. However, the substratum could be removed to deeper water where conditions are unsuitable for the alga's growth. An increase in wave exposure could also lead to a shift in the type of sediment, removing suitable substrata for Chorda filum. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | High | High | Moderate | Moderate |
Decrease in wave exposure [Show more]Decrease in wave exposureA change of two ranks on the wave exposure scale (view glossary) e.g., from Exposed to Extremely exposed for a period of one year. Further details EvidenceChorda filum can be found in sheltered and very sheltered habitats and, therefore, a decrease in wave exposure is not thought to be relevant. | Not relevant | Not relevant | Not relevant | Moderate |
Noise [Show more]Noise
EvidenceSeaweeds have no known mechanism for perception of noise | Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | High |
Visual presence [Show more]Visual presenceBenchmark. The continuous presence for one month of moving objects not naturally found in the marine environment (e.g., boats, machinery, and humans) within the visual envelope of the species or community under consideration. Further details EvidenceSeaweeds have no known mechanism for visual perception. | Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | High |
Abrasion & physical disturbance [Show more]Abrasion & physical disturbanceBenchmark. Force equivalent to a standard scallop dredge landing on or being dragged across the organism. A single event is assumed for assessment. This factor includes mechanical interference, crushing, physical blows against, or rubbing and erosion of the organism or habitat of interest. Where trampling is relevant, the evidence and trampling intensity will be reported in the rationale. Further details. EvidencePhysical disturbance equivalent to a passing scallop dredge (see benchmark) is likely to remove a proportion of the population. Therefore, an intolerance or intermediate has been recorded. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Displacement [Show more]DisplacementBenchmark. Removal of the organism from the substratum and displacement from its original position onto a suitable substratum. A single event is assumed for assessment. Further details EvidenceChorda filum can survive being displaced, if the substratum moves with the plants attached. Stormy weather can transport plants attached to sediment to more sheltered locations where they continue growing (South & Burrows, 1967). However, Chorda filum cannot tolerate displacement if it is removed from the substratum (see substratum loss). Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | High | High | Moderate | Moderate |
Chemical pressures
Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence / Confidence | |
Synthetic compound contamination [Show more]Synthetic compound contaminationSensitivity is assessed against the available evidence for the effects of contaminants on the species (or closely related species at low confidence) or community of interest. For example:
The evidence used is stated in the rationale. Where the assessment can be based on a known activity then this is stated. The tolerance to contaminants of species of interest will be included in the rationale when available; together with relevant supporting material. Further details. EvidenceOther seaweeds in the same order e.g. Laminaria digitata have been shown to be of intermediate intolerance to synthetic chemical contamination. However, insufficient information was available to assess the sensitivity of Chorda filum. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Heavy metal contamination [Show more]Heavy metal contaminationEvidenceOther seaweeds in the same order e.g. Saccharina latissima have been shown to be of intermediate intolerance to synthetic chemical contamination. However, insufficient information was available to assess the sensitivity of Chorda filum. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Hydrocarbon contamination [Show more]Hydrocarbon contaminationEvidenceSaccharina latissima, Laminaria digitata and Laminaria hyperborea have all been assessed as being of low intolerance to hydrocarbon contamination. However, insufficient information was available to assess sensitivity. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Radionuclide contamination [Show more]Radionuclide contaminationEvidenceInsufficientinformation. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Changes in nutrient levels [Show more]Changes in nutrient levelsEvidenceNutrients are essential for the growth of the alga. A decrease in nutrient levels would reduce growth rates. A slight increase in the level of nutrients may enhance growth, but high levels of nutrients may cause overgrowth of the alga by ephemeral green seaweed (Fletcher, 1996). Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Increase in salinity [Show more]Increase in salinity
EvidenceChorda filum can be found in full salinity environments and therefore a further increase in salinity is unlikely. Therefore, not relevant has been recorded. | Not relevant | Not relevant | Not relevant | Moderate |
Decrease in salinity [Show more]Decrease in salinity
EvidenceThe species is found in low salinity environments such as estuaries and the Baltic and has been successfully cultured at salinities as low as 5 psu (Norton & South, 1969). It is also found in lagoonal habitats with low salinity (for example, see biotope SIR.FChoG). However, plants from fully saline conditions decay on immersion in freshwater (Russell, 1985). Overall, intolerance has been assessed as low. Recruitment rates of the species are not known, however it has a fast growth rate and high fecundity and recovery rates are probably high. | Low | High | Low | |
Changes in oxygenation [Show more]Changes in oxygenationBenchmark. Exposure to a dissolved oxygen concentration of 2 mg/l for one week. Further details. EvidenceInsufficientinformation | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Biological pressures
Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence / Confidence | |
Introduction of microbial pathogens/parasites [Show more]Introduction of microbial pathogens/parasitesBenchmark. Sensitivity can only be assessed relative to a known, named disease, likely to cause partial loss of a species population or community. Further details. EvidenceInsufficientinformation | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Introduction of non-native species [Show more]Introduction of non-native speciesSensitivity assessed against the likely effect of the introduction of alien or non-native species in Britain or Ireland. Further details. EvidenceThe Japweed Sargassum muticum may have displaced Chorda filum from unstable habitats (Hill et al., 1998). | Intermediate | High | Low | High |
Extraction of this species [Show more]Extraction of this speciesBenchmark. Extraction removes 50% of the species or community from the area under consideration. Sensitivity will be assessed as 'intermediate'. The habitat remains intact or recovers rapidly. Any effects of the extraction process on the habitat itself are addressed under other factors, e.g. displacement, abrasion and physical disturbance, and substratum loss. Further details. EvidenceLittle evidence has been found on the impact of extraction of Chorda filum. However, if removed recovery should be rapid. The species is an annual and recruitment rates are likely to be high so recovery is expected to take place within a year or two. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Extraction of other species [Show more]Extraction of other speciesBenchmark. A species that is a required host or prey for the species under consideration (and assuming that no alternative host exists) or a keystone species in a biotope is removed. Any effects of the extraction process on the habitat itself are addressed under other factors, e.g. displacement, abrasion and physical disturbance, and substratum loss. Further details. EvidenceInsufficientinformation | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Additional information
Importance review
Policy/legislation
- no data -
Status
National (GB) importance | - | Global red list (IUCN) category | - |
Non-native
Parameter | Data |
---|---|
Native | - |
Origin | - |
Date Arrived | - |
Importance information
Chorda filum is used fresh as a foodstuff but only in Japan.The sporophytes may support a rich epiflora and epifauna. The most common epiflora include Acrochaete repens, Bolbocoleon piliferum and Ectocarpus siliculosus. Common epifauna include Lacuna vincta, Natica spp. and Spirorbis spirorbis.The epiphytes may cause considerable damage to the sporophytes.Bibliography
Breeman, A.M., 1988. Relative importance of temperature and other factors in determining geographic boundaries of seaweeds: experimental and phenological evidence. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 42, 199-241.
Fletcher, R.L., 1996. The occurrence of 'green tides' - a review. In Marine Benthic Vegetation. Recent changes and the Effects of Eutrophication (ed. W. Schramm & P.H. Nienhuis). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. [Ecological Studies, vol. 123].
Guiry, M.D. & Blunden, G., 1991. Seaweed Resources in Europe: Uses and Potential. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
Guiry, M.D. & Nic Dhonncha, E., 2002. AlgaeBase. World Wide Web electronic publication http://www.algaebase.org,
Hardy, F.G. & Guiry, M.D., 2003. A check-list and atlas of the seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. London: British Phycological Society
Norton, T.A. & South, G.R., 1969. Influence of reduced salinity on the distribution of two laminarian algae. Oikos, 20, 320-326
Russell, G., 1985. Some anatomical and physiological differences in Chorda filum from coastal waters of Finland and Great Britain. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 343-349.
South, G.H. & Burrows, E.M., 1967. Studies on marine algae of the British Isles. 5. Chorda filum (l.) Stckh. British Phycological Bulletin, 3 , 379-402.
Datasets
Centre for Environmental Data and Recording, 2018. Ulster Museum Marine Surveys of Northern Ireland Coastal Waters. Occurrence dataset https://www.nmni.com/CEDaR/CEDaR-Centre-for-Environmental-Data-and-Recording.aspx accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-25.
Cofnod – North Wales Environmental Information Service, 2018. Miscellaneous records held on the Cofnod database. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/hcgqsi accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-25.
Environmental Records Information Centre North East, 2018. ERIC NE Combined dataset to 2017. Occurrence dataset: http://www.ericnortheast.org.ukl accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-38
Fenwick, 2018. Aphotomarine. Occurrence dataset http://www.aphotomarine.com/index.html Accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2014. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/erweal accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2015. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/xtrbvy accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2016. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/146yiz accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Kent Wildlife Trust, 2018. Kent Wildlife Trust Shoresearch Intertidal Survey 2004 onwards. Occurrence dataset: https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2017. Isle of Man wildlife records from 01/01/2000 to 13/02/2017. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/mopwow accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2018. Isle of Man historical wildlife records 1995 to 1999. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/lo2tge accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Merseyside BioBank., 2018. Merseyside BioBank (unverified). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/iou2ld accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
National Trust, 2017. National Trust Species Records. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/opc6g1 accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
NBN (National Biodiversity Network) Atlas. Available from: https://www.nbnatlas.org.
OBIS (Ocean Biodiversity Information System), 2024. Global map of species distribution using gridded data. Available from: Ocean Biogeographic Information System. www.iobis.org. Accessed: 2024-11-22
Outer Hebrides Biological Recording, 2018. Non-vascular Plants, Outer Hebrides. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/goidos accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 2018. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Herbarium (E). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/ypoair accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre, 2018. SEWBReC Algae and allied species (South East Wales). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/55albd accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
Citation
This review can be cited as:
Last Updated: 07/11/2006