Rhodothamniella floridula on sand-scoured lower eulittoral rock

Summary

UK and Ireland classification

Description

Lower eulittoral and sublittoral fringe bedrock and boulders subject to mild sand-scouring characterized by a canopy of the wracks Fucus serratus or Fucus vesiculosus, beneath which a mat of the sand-binding red seaweed Rhodothamniella floridula occurs. These mats can form distinct areas without Fucus serratus. The small hummocks of Rhodothamniella floridula also contain a diversity of other red seaweeds tolerant of sand scour, e.g. Palmaria palmata, Chondrus crispus, coralline crusts and Mastocarpus stellatus. The brown seaweed Cladostephus spongiosus or the ephemeral green seaweed Ulva intestinalis, Ulva lactuca or Cladophora rupestris may occur. The hydroid Dynamena pumila can form colonies on the Fucus serratus fronds. The barnacle Semibalanus balanoides, the limpet Patella vulgata, the anemone Actinia equina and the polychaete Spirobranchus triqueter may be present where bedrock are available along with a few winkles such as Littorina littorea. In addition, polychaetes and amphipods may burrow into the Rhodothamniella floridula mat, while the mussel Mytilus edulis is restricted to small crevices in the bedrock. The species diversity of this biotope is normally low and there can be much variation in the species composition from site to site. (Information from Connor et al., 2004).

Depth range

Lower shore

Additional information

As the dominance of species varies from one to another so the colour of these populations may range from bright or dark green to various sandy, brownish-red shades, the whole contrasting sharply with adjacent areas of Fucus spp. (Lewis, 1964).

Listed By

Further information sources

Search on:

Habitat review

Ecology

Ecological and functional relationships

This biotope is predominantly of algae which dominate the rock surface and canopy. Macroalgae provide habitats for many species of invertebrates and fish and also provide shade under their canopy.

Rock type and sand scour effects are of critical importance to the development of this biotope. Sand-binding algal species are able to colonize soft or crumbly rock more successfully than fucoids (Lewis, 1964). Where sand scour is severe, fucoids and Rhodothamniella floridula tend to be absent while ephemeral green algae dominate the substratum and a different biotope will be present (Connor et al., 1997b).

Seasonal and longer term change

No information was found specifically on this biotope. However, some general observations from rocky shore communities are relevant.
  • Ephemeral green algae may show a peak in abundance during the spring.
  • Winter storms will reduce or damage fucoids and macroalgal cover.
  • Crab and fish tend to move to deeper water in the winter months, so that predation is probably reduced.
  • Corallina officinalis may be overgrown by epiphytes, especially during summer. This overgrowth regularly leads to high mortality of fronds due to light reduction (Wiedemann pers comm. to Tyler-Walters, 2000).
  • At least in northern Britain, Littorina littorea migrates down shore as temperatures fall in autumn (to reduce exposure to sub-zero temperatures) and up shore as temperatures rise in spring; migration depends on local winter temperatures.
  • The upper limit of distribution of Patella vulgata on a shore is increased by shade and exposure. In some situations seasonal variations in sunshine causes a downward migration in spring/summer and an upward migration in autumn/winter (Lewis, 1954).

Habitat structure and complexity

Bedrock and boulders form the substratum in this biotope; the pits, crevices and inclination of which create microhabitats exploitable by both mobile and sessile epilithic species. In addition, the macroalgal species of the community add considerable structural complexity to the biotope in the form of additional substratum for settlement by epiphytic species. The sand scour tolerant species, Rhodothamniella floridula, enhances the structural complexity by binding sand within a mat over the rocky substratum into which polychaetes and amphipods can burrow. There is likely to be considerable structural heterogeneity over a small scale within the biotope. For instance, although barnacles may form a dense layer over the substratum that largely excludes other species, the gaps created by dead barnacles may be exploited by small invertebrates.

Productivity

Rocky shore communities are highly productive and are an important source of food and nutrients for members of neighbouring terrestrial and marine ecosystems (Hill et al., 1998). Macroalgae exude considerable amounts of dissolved organic carbon which is taken up readily by bacteria and may even be taken up directly by some larger invertebrates. Dissolved organic carbon, algal fragments and microbial film organisms are continually removed by the sea. This may enter the food chain of local, subtidal ecosystems, or be exported further offshore. Rocky shores make a contribution to the food of many marine species through the production of planktonic larvae and propagules which contribute to pelagic food chains.

Recruitment processes

Many rocky shore species, plant and animal, possess a planktonic stage: gamete, spore or larva which float in the plankton before settling and metamorphosing into adult form. This strategy allows species to rapidly colonize new areas that become available such as in the gaps often created by storms. For these organisms it has long been evident that recruitment from the pelagic phase is important in governing the density of populations on the shore (Little & Kitching, 1996). Both the demographic structure of populations and the composition of assemblages may be profoundly affected by variation in recruitment rates.

  • Community structure and dynamics are strongly influenced by larval supply. Annual variation in recruitment success, of algae, limpets and barnacles can have a significant impact on the patchiness of the shore.

  • The propagules of most macroalgae tend to settle near the parent plant (Schiel & Foster, 1986; Norton, 1992; Holt et al., 1997). For example, red algal spores and gametes are immotile and the propagules of Fucales are large and sink readily. Norton (1992) noted that algal spore dispersal is probably determined by currents and turbulent deposition (zygotes or spores being thrown against the substratum). For example, spores of Ulva spp. have been reported to travel 35km. The reach of the furthest propagule and useful dispersal range are not the same thing and recruitment usually occurs on a local scale, typically within 10m of the parent plant (Norton, 1992). Vadas et al. (1992) noted that post-settlement mortality of algal propagules and early germlings was high, primarily due to grazing, canopy and turf effects, water movement and desiccation (in the intertidal) and concluded that algal recruitment was highly variable and sporadic. However, macroalgae are highly fecund and widespread in the coastal zone so that recruitment may be still be rapid, especially in the rapid growing ephemeral species such as Ulva spp. and Ulva lactuca, which reproduce throughout the year with a peak in summer. Similarly, Ceramium species produce reproductive propagules throughout the year (Dixon & Irvine, 1977; Burrows, 1991; Maggs & Hommersand, 1993).
  • Gastropods exhibit a variety of reproductive life cycles. The common limpet Patella vulgata and the periwinkle Littorina littorea have pelagic larvae with a high dispersal potential, although recruitment and settlement is probably variable.
  • Barnacles such as Semibalanus balanoides have a planktonic nauplius larva, which spends about 2 months in the plankton, with high dispersal potential. Peak settlement in Semibalanus balanoides occurs in April-May in the west and May-June in the east and north of the British Isles, However, settlement intensity is variable, subsequent recruitment is inhibited by the sweeping action of macroalgal canopies (e.g. fucoids) or the bulldozing of limpets and other gastropods (see MarLIN review for details).
  • Many species of mobile epifauna, such as polychaetes that may be associated with patches of mussels or rock crevices, have long lived pelagic larvae and/or are highly motile as adults.

Time for community to reach maturity

The MLR.Rho biotope consists mainly of algal species, with high spore production and dispersal potential, enabling rapid colonization and recolonization. The development of the community from bare or denuded rock is likely to be similar to that occurring after an oil spill. Recovery of rocky shore populations was intensively studied after the Torrey Canyon oil spill in March 1967. Areas affected by oil alone recovered rapidly, within 3 years. If rocks or boulders are present with sand in suspension, it is likely that recovery of the MLR.Rho biotope would take approximately the same amount of time.

Additional information

No text entered

Preferences & Distribution

Habitat preferences

Depth Range Lower shore
Water clarity preferencesOceanic water
Limiting Nutrients Nitrogen (nitrates)
Salinity preferences Full (30-40 psu)
Physiographic preferences Open coast
Biological zone preferences Eulittoral, Lower eulittoral
Substratum/habitat preferences Bedrock, Large to very large boulders, Small boulders
Tidal strength preferences Moderately strong 1 to 3 knots (0.5-1.5 m/sec.), Weak < 1 knot (<0.5 m/sec.)
Wave exposure preferences Exposed, Moderately exposed
Other preferences

Additional Information

No text entered

Species composition

Species found especially in this biotope

    Rare or scarce species associated with this biotope

    -

    Additional information

    No text entered

    Sensitivity review

    Sensitivity characteristics of the habitat and relevant characteristic species

    This biotope is characterized by mats of the small red seaweed Rhodothamniella floridula, which is present on rock surfaces, with or without a canopy of Fucus serratus or Fucus vesiculosus. Mats of Rhodothamniella floridula are considered the key characterizing feature of this biotope and the sensitivity assessments are therefore focussed on this species. The biotope occurs in the lower eulittoral and sublittoral fringe on bedrock and boulders that are subject to mild sand-scouring and has quite specific habitat requirements, Rhodothamniella floridula only occurs in areas of rock with a sand supply:sediment availability and transport processes are therefore significant. The environmental factors are considered within the sensitivity assessments where they may be altered by the pressure.

    Species that are common on a range of rocky shores also occur in this biotope. The small hummocks of Rhodothamniella floridula also contain a diversity of other red seaweeds tolerant of sand scour, e.g. Palmaria palmata, Chondrus crispus, coralline crusts and Mastocarpus stellatus. The brown seaweed Cladostephus spongiosus or the ephemeral green seaweed Ulva intestinalis, Ulva lactuca or Cladophora rupestris may occur. The hydroid Dynamena pumila can form colonies on the Fucus serratus fronds. The barnacle Semibalanus balanoides, the limpet Patella vulgata, the anemone Actinia equina and the polychaete Spirobranchus triqueter may be present where bedrock is available along with a few winkles such as Littorina littorea. In addition, polychaetes and amphipods may burrow into the Rhodothamniella floridula mat, while the mussel Mytilus edulis is restricted to small crevices in the bedrock. The species diversity of this biotope is normally low and there can be much variation in the species composition from site to site. These species are not considered key characterizing species or to provide key structures or functions and the assessments largely avoid discussion of the associated biological assemblage except in the most general terms. 

    Resilience and recovery rates of habitat

    The key characterizing species, the red algae Rhodothamniella floridula is attached to the substratum and is considered unable to re-attach following removal. Recovery of the biotope will therefore depend on the supply or propagules to repopulate surfaces where the population is removed or partly removed. No information was found relating to colonization or recolonization rates of Rhodothamniella floridula and some inferences have been made from the distribution of this species and from the life-history traits of similar species.

    Rhodothamniella floridula is widely distributed around the UK, so that potentially suitable shores can be recolonized from adjacent populations.  The species appears to have an annual life-cycle, the sandy turfs produced by this algae are thickest in the winter and become bleached in summer. Where they die back they lose sand. Red algae are typically high fecund, but their spores are non-motile (Norton, 1992) and therefore highly reliant on the hydrodynamic regime for dispersal. Kain (1975) reported that after displacement some Rhodophyceae were present after 11 weeks, and after 41 weeks, in June, Rhodophyceae species predominated. However, Stegenga (1978) noted that tetrasporangia of Rhodothamniella floridula (as Rhodochorton floridulum) germinated in 'rather low numbers'.  

    Resilience assessment. Where resistance to an impact from a pressure is ‘High’, resilience is assessed as ‘High’ by default (no impact to recover from). The presence of adult plants locally will aid the recovery of small areas by providing spores and, recovery is, therefore, also assessed as ‘High’, where resistance is ‘Medium’. Based on non-motile spores and the low germination rates reported by Stegenga (1978), recovery from more significant impacts (where resistance is ‘Low’ or ‘Medium’ ) is assessed as ‘Medium’, (2-10 years). Due to the lack of evidence, confidence in resilience is low.

    Note: The resilience and the ability to recover from human-induced pressures is a combination of the environmental conditions of the site, the frequency (repeated disturbances versus a one-off event) and the intensity of the disturbance.  Recovery of impacted populations will always be mediated by stochastic events and processes acting over different scales including, but not limited to, local habitat conditions, further impacts and processes such as larval-supply and recruitment between populations. Full recovery is defined as the return to the state of the habitat that existed prior to impact.  This does not necessarily mean that every component species has returned to its prior condition, abundance or extent but that the relevant functional components are present and the habitat is structurally and functionally recognisable as the initial habitat of interest. It should be noted that the recovery rates are only indicative of the recovery potential.

    Hydrological Pressures

    Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

    ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
    Temperature increase (local) [Show more]

    Temperature increase (local)

    Benchmark. A 5°C increase in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    Species found in the intertidal are exposed to extremes of high and low air temperatures during periods of emersion. They must also be able to cope with sharp temperature fluctuations over a short period of time during the tidal cycle. In winter air temperatures are colder than the sea, conversely in summer air temperatures are much warmer than the sea The rocky shore species associated with this biotope are therefore likely to have a degree of resistance to temperature changes.

    Maximum sea surface temperatures around the British Isles rarely exceed 20 °C (Hiscock, 1998) and, as Rhodothamniella floridula has a global distribution (Guiry & Guiry, 2015, and references therein)  it is, over the whole of its range, subject to a wider range of temperatures than experienced in the British Isles. It is therefore expected that increases in temperature, at the pressure benchmarks, will not result in mortality of the species.

    However, increases in temperature above the pressure benchmark,  may cause photosynthesis and growth to be impaired. For instance, Dixon & Irvine (1977) observed that the growth of Rhodothamniella floridula (as Audouinella floridula) is much faster in winter, whilst in the summer the spongy cushion can become bleached or disrupted. Stegenga (1978) found that tetraspores of cultured Rhodothamniella floridula (as Rhodochorton floridulum) were formed under all combinations of temperatures from 4 °C to 16 °C at any length of daylight, although they were most abundant at high temperatures and long days.

    Sensitivity assessment.  Based on the global distribution resistance to both acute and chronic increases in temperature at the pressure benchmark are assessed as ‘High’, and resilience is also assessed as ‘High’ by default, so that this biotope is considered to be ‘Not sensitive’. Species may be acclimated to prevailing environmental conditions, so that distribution is only a proxy indicator of sensitivity and confidence in this assessment is Low.

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Temperature decrease (local) [Show more]

    Temperature decrease (local)

    Benchmark. A 5°C decrease in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    Species found in the intertidal are exposed to extremes of high and low air temperatures during periods of emersion. They must also be able to cope with sharp temperature fluctuations over a short period of time during the tidal cycle. In winter air temperatures are colder than the sea, conversely in summer air temperatures are much warmer than the sea.  The rocky shore species associated with this biotope  are therefore likely to have a degree of resistance to temperature changes.

    Dixon & Irvine (1977) observed that the growth of Rhodothamniella floridula (as Audouinella floridula) is much faster in winter, whilst in the summer the spongy cushion can become bleached or disrupted. It is therefore likely that a reduction in temperature will increase the growth rate of the species.

    Minimum surface seawater temperatures rarely fall below 5°C around the British Isles (Hiscock, 1998) and, as Rhodothamniella floridula has a global distribution (Guiry & Guiry, 2015, and references therein)  it is, over the whole of its range, subject to a wider range of temperatures than experienced in the British Isles. It is therefore expected that a decrease in temperature will not result in mortality of the species.

    However, low temperatures may delay or slow reproduction. Stegenga (1978) found that spores of cultured Rhodothamniella floridula (as Rhodochorton floridulum) were formed under all combinations of temperatures from 4°C to 16°C at any length of daylight, although they were most abundant at high temperatures and long days.

    Sensitivity assessment.  Based on the global distribution resistance to both acute and chronic decreases in temperature at the pressure benchmark are assessed as ‘High’, and resilience is also assessed as ‘High’ by default, so that this biotope is considered to be ‘Not sensitive’. Species may be acclimated to prevailing environmental conditions, so that distribution is only a proxy indicator of sensitivity and confidence in this assessment is Low.

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Salinity increase (local) [Show more]

    Salinity increase (local)

    Benchmark. A increase in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat. Further detail

    Evidence

    The Rhodothamniella floridula dominated biotope  occurs in full salinity conditions. Although no information has been found on survival in hypersaline conditions, the species occurs in rockpools where evaporation may occasionally lead to higher than normal salinities suggesting the species may have at least a short-term tolerance.

    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Salinity decrease (local) [Show more]

    Salinity decrease (local)

    Benchmark. A decrease in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat. Further detail

    Evidence

    Biotopes found in the intertidal will naturally experience fluctuations in salinity where evaporation increases salinity and inputs of rainwater expose individuals to freshwater. Species found in the intertidal are therefore likely to have some form of behavioural or physiological adaptations to changes in salinity. As this biotope is present in full salinity, the assessed change at the pressure benchmark is a reduction in salinity to a variable regime (18-35 ppt). No information was found on the effects of reduced salinity on the key characterizing species Rhodothamniella floridula. However, as this species occurs only in full salinity conditions it is probable that a proportion of the population would die in lower salinities. Therefore, resistance has been assessed as ‘Low’ and recovery (following habitat recovery) is assessed as ‘Medium’ (2-10 years). Sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’.

    		Low
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Medium
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Medium
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Water flow (tidal current) changes (local) [Show more]

    Water flow (tidal current) changes (local)

    Benchmark. A change in peak mean spring bed flow velocity of between 0.1 m/s to 0.2 m/s for more than one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    The biotope with which Rhodothamniella floridula is associated occurs in areas where the water flow rate is either 'moderately strong' (0.5-1.5 m/s) or 'weak' (>0.5 m/s) (Connor et al., 2004). Moderate water movement is beneficial to seaweeds as it carries a supply of nutrients and gases to the plants and removes waste products. However, if flow becomes too strong, plants may become displaced. Additionally, an increase to stronger flows may inhibit settlement of spores and remove adults or germlings. Rhodothamniella floridula has a compact solid 'mat' or 'cushion' which probably makes it resistant to displacement by an increase in water flow.

    Although Rhodothamniella floridula may not be directly sensitive to changes in water flow at the pressure benchmark, changes in flow that result in changes in sediment transport may result in negative effects. The biotope is present where sand scours and abrades the rock, preventing the establishment of fucoids. An increase or decrease in flow, that results in less, or no, sand being deposited on the rocks due  to a lack  of re-suspension from source sediments or  velocities too high to allow sand to settle, may lead to a change in the biotope. Sediment transport processes are influenced by a range of site-specific factors including local sediment supply and topography. A generic assessment is not possible and this indirect effect is not assessed. It should be noted also that wave action may be a more important factor for sediment transport in this biotope than local tidal currents.

    Sensitivity assessment. The biotope is found across a range of flow rates, mid-range populations are considered to have 'High' resistance to a change in water flow at the pressure benchmark (although see sediment supply caveats). Resilience is assessed as ‘High’, by default, and the biotope is considered ‘Not sensitive’.

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Emergence regime changes [Show more]

    Emergence regime changes

    Benchmark.  1) A change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of ≥1 year or 2) an increase in relative sea level or decrease in high water level for ≥1 year. Further detail

    Evidence

    Rhodothamniella floridula occurs predominantly in the littoral and sublittoral to about 5m depth (Dickinson, 1963; Dixon & Irvine, 1997) (as Rhodochorton floridulum and Audouinella floridula respectively) and is often found in rockpools.  Emergence regime is a key factor structuring this (and other) intertidal biotopes.  Increased emergence may reduce habitat suitability for the characterizing species Rhodothamniella floridula  through greater exposure to desiccation and fluctuations in temperature and salinity when emersed (above the surface) and reduced photosynthetic rates when immersed (submerged).  Changes in emergence may therefore lead to physical stress followed by species replacement through competition with species more tolerant of the changed conditions. The descriptions in Connor et al., (2004) of the biotopes typically found above and below this biotope on the shore give some indication of potential changes. Above this biotope in sand influenced areas are a community dominated by Mytilus edulis and Fucus vesiculosus or where the sand scour is more severe, is a biotope dominated by ephemeral seaweeds such as Ulva spp. and the red seaweed Porphyra spp (Connor et al., 2004). Below this biotope are biotopes dominated by Fucus serratus and/or red seaweeds or biotopes dominated by kelp such as Alaria esculenta and/or Laminaria digitata.

    Sensitivity assessment.  As emergence is a key factor structuring the distribution of macroalgae on the shore, resistance to a change in emergence (increase or decrease) is assessed as ‘Low’. Recovery is assessed as ‘Medium’ (following habitat recovery) and sensitivity is therefore assessed as 'Medium' . This sensitivity assessment is generic, but it should be noted that populations of Rhodothamniella floridula at the landward limit of distribution may be less sensitive to increased submergence (habitat becomes more similar to the lower shore/sublittoral fringe), whereas populations closer to the sublittoral limit may be less sensitive to increased emergence (where conditions become equivalent to the lower eulittoral). Mobile species associated with this biotope, Littorina spp. and Patella vulgata, would be able to relocate to preferred shore levels. Attached species, such as Mytilus edulis, and Spirobranchus triqueter, are found at a range of shore levels but may experience greater predation levels following increased submergence.

    		Low
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Medium
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Medium
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Wave exposure changes (local) [Show more]

    Wave exposure changes (local)

    Benchmark. A change in near shore significant wave height of >3% but <5% for more than one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    The biotope with which Rhodothamniella floridula is mostly associated occurs in wave exposed or moderately exposed locations (Connor et al., 2004). The degree of wave exposure influences significant wave height, as in more exposed areas with a longer fetch, waves would be predicted to be higher. The occurrence of this biotope across two wave exposure categories, was considered to indicate, by proxy, that biotopes in the middle of the wave exposure range would tolerate either an increase or decrease in significant wave height at the pressure benchmark.

    Stronger wave action is likely to cause damage to filaments, resulting in reduced photosynthesis and compromised growth, but more likely dislodgement by the force of wave action and by scouring from sand and gravel mobilised by increased wave action (Hiscock, 1983). The deepest living individuals are likely to avoid the worst impact of wave exposure, but some mortality in the total population is likely.  

    Changes in wave action that result in changes in sediment transport may result in negative effects. The biotope is present where sand scours and abrades the rock, preventing the establishment of fucoids. An increase or decrease in wave action, that results in less, or no, sand being deposited on the rocks due to a lack  of re-suspension from source sediments may lead to a change in the biotope. Conversely reduced wave action that results in permanent deposition of sediments may lead in the short-term to removal of this biotope due to smothering.Sediment transport processes are influenced by a range of site-specific factors including local sediment supply and topograghy. A generic assessment is not possible and this indirect effect is not assessed.

    Sensitivity assessment. Based on reported distribution, resistance to changes in wave height, at the pressure benchmark, is assessed as ‘High’, and resilience is also assessed as ‘High’ by default. The biotope is therefore considered to be ‘Not sensitive’. 

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help

    Chemical Pressures

    Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

    ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
    Transition elements & organo-metal contamination [Show more]

    Transition elements & organo-metal contamination

    Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

    Contamination at levels greater than the benchmark may impact this biotope. Bryan (1984) suggested that the general order for heavy metal toxicity in seaweeds is: Organic Hg > inorganic Hg > Cu > Ag > Zn > Cd > Pb. Cole et al. (1999) reported that Hg was very toxic to macrophytes. The sub-lethal effects of Hg (organic and inorganic) on the sporelings of an intertidal red algae, Plumaria elegans, were reported by Boney (1971). 100% growth inhibition was caused by 1 ppm Hg. No information was found concerning the effects of heavy metals on Rhodothamniella floridula specifically.

    		Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination [Show more]

    Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination

    Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

    Contamination at levels greater than the benchmark may impact this biotope. No evidence was found specifically relating to the intolerance of Rhodothamniella floridula to hydrocarbon contamination. However, inferences may be drawn from the sensitivities of red algal species generally. O'Brien & Dixon (1976) suggested that red algae were the most sensitive group of algae to oil or dispersant contamination, possibly due to the susceptibility of phycoerythrins to destruction. Laboratory studies of the effects of oil and dispersants on several red algal species concluded that they were all sensitive to oil/dispersant mixtures, with little difference between adults, sporelings, diploid or haploid life stages (Grandy, 1984, cited in Holt et al., 1995).

    		Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Synthetic compound contamination [Show more]

    Synthetic compound contamination

    Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

    Contamination at levels greater than the benchmark may impact this biotope. No information was found relating to the effects of synthetic chemicals on Rhodothamniella floridula. However, inferences may be drawn from the sensitivities of red algal species generally. O'Brien & Dixon (1976) suggested that red algae were the most sensitive group of algae to oil or dispersant contamination, possibly due to the susceptibility of phycoerythrins to destruction. They also reported that red algae are effective indicators of detergent damage since they undergo colour changes when exposed to a relatively low concentration of detergent. Laboratory studies of the effects of oil and dispersants on several red algal species concluded that they were all sensitive to oil/dispersant mixtures, with little difference between adults, sporelings, diploid or haploid stages (Grandy, 1984, cited in Holt et al., 1995). Cole et al. (1999) suggested that herbicides, such as simazine and atrazine were very toxic to macrophytes. The evidence suggests that in general red algae are very intolerant of synthetic chemicals.

    		Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Radionuclide contamination [Show more]

    Radionuclide contamination

    Benchmark. An increase in 10µGy/h above background levels. Further detail

    Evidence

    No evidence.

    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Introduction of other substances [Show more]

    Introduction of other substances

    Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

    Evidence

    This pressure is Not assessed.

    		Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    De-oxygenation [Show more]

    De-oxygenation

    Benchmark. Exposure to dissolved oxygen concentration of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for one week (a change from WFD poor status to bad status). Further detail

    Evidence

    The effects of reduced oxygenation on algae are not well studied. Plants require oxygen for respiration, but this may be provided by production of oxygen during periods of photosynthesis. Lack of oxygen may impair both respiration and photosynthesis (see review by Vidaver, 1972). A study of the effects of anoxia on another red alga, Delesseria sanguinea, revealed that specimens died after 24 hours at 15°C but that some survived at 5°C (Hammer, 1972). No evidence is available to make an intolerance assessment for the key characterizing species, Rhodothamniella floridula.

    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Nutrient enrichment [Show more]

    Nutrient enrichment

    Benchmark. Compliance with WFD criteria for good status. Further detail

    Evidence

    A moderate increase in nutrient levels may enhance the growth of the key characterizing species Rhodothamniella floridula. However, excessive eutrophication would probably result in the species being out-competed by ephemeral species with rapid growth rates, such as filamentous green and brown algae. The pressure benchamrk is protective of habitat condition, resistance is therefore assessed as 'High' and resilience as 'High', so that the biotope is considered to be 'Not sensitive'.

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Organic enrichment [Show more]

    Organic enrichment

    Benchmark. A deposit of 100 gC/m2/yr. Further detail

    Evidence

    No evidence was found to assess this pressure. The Rhodothamniella floridula biotope is considered to be structured largely by physical factors (wave exposure, sand supply and abrasion) that mediate competition rather than food supply. Additional organic matter supplied to this biotope is likely to be removed by wave action or trapped and incorporated into the sediment mat, held in place by Rhodothamniella floridula. Within the mat it would enhance secondary production by the associated polychaetes and amphipods and would be likely to be rapidly consumed. Resistance to this pressure is therefore assessed as 'High' and resilience as 'Hign' and the biotope is considered to be 'Not sensitive'. 

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help

    Physical Pressures

    Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

    ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
    Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat) [Show more]

    Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat)

    Benchmark. A permanent loss of existing saline habitat within the site. Further detail

    Evidence

    All marine habitats and benthic species are considered to have a resistance of ‘None’ to this pressure and to be unable to recover from a permanent loss of habitat (resilience is ‘Very Low’).  Sensitivity within the direct spatial footprint of this pressure is therefore ‘High’.  Although no specific evidence is described confidence in this assessment is ‘High’, due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure.

    		None
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Very Low
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Physical change (to another seabed type) [Show more]

    Physical change (to another seabed type)

    Benchmark. Permanent change from sedimentary or soft rock substrata to hard rock or artificial substrata or vice-versa. Further detail

    Evidence

    This biotope occurs on hard substrata where macroalgae, including the characterizing mats of Rhodothamniells floridula, can attach. A sedimentary habitat would be unsuitable for many of the associated attached species and lead to the development of a sedimentary biotope typical of the changed conditions. It is not clear whether artificial substrata could support this biotope.

    Sensitivity assessment. A change to a sedimentary habitat would reduce habitat suitability for this biotope, resistance is assessed as ‘None’ and resilience as ‘Very Low’ as the change is considered to be permanent. Sensitivity is therefore assessed as 'High'.

    		None
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Very Low
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help
    Physical change (to another sediment type) [Show more]

    Physical change (to another sediment type)

    Benchmark. Permanent change in one Folk class (based on UK SeaMap simplified classification). Further detail

    Evidence

    Not relevant to biotopes occurring on bedrock.

    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction) [Show more]

    Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction)

    Benchmark. The extraction of substratum to 30 cm (where substratum includes sediments and soft rock but excludes hard bedrock). Further detail

    Evidence

    The species characterizing this biotope are epifauna or epiflora occurring on rock and would be sensitive to the removal of the habitat. However, extraction of rock substratum is considered unlikely and this pressure is considered to be ‘Not relevant’ to hard substratum habitats.

    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed [Show more]

    Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed

    Benchmark. Damage to surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat). Further detail

    Evidence

    No information was found concerning the effects of abrasion on Rhodothamniella floridula. However, this species is characteristic of sand scoured habitats and the growth form of a dense mat, consolidated by sediment is probably tolerant of low intensity and magnitude surface abrasion such as a single trampling event.

    Sensitivity assessment.  Resistance to abrasion at the surface only is assessed as ‘Medium’ as a small proportion of the mat is likely to be removed in the impact footprint, Recovery is assessed as ‘High’ and sensitivity is assessed as ‘Low’. 

    		Medium
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface [Show more]

    Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface

    Benchmark. Damage to sub-surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat). Further detail

    Evidence

    Activities that disturb the surface of the mat and penetrate below the surface are likely to tear up and remove a significant proportion of the mat. Resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’ and recovery is assessed as ‘Medium’. Sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’.

    		Low
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Medium
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Medium
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Changes in suspended solids (water clarity) [Show more]

    Changes in suspended solids (water clarity)

    Benchmark. A change in one rank on the WFD (Water Framework Directive) scale e.g. from clear to intermediate for one year. Further detail

    Evidence

    No direct evidence was found to assess this pressure, however this species is categorised as tolerant of sediments as it is frequently found on rocky coasts with high levels of sediments, where rock surfaces are scoured and covered by sand (Airoldi, 2003).  The branched thalli is tough and the mats of Rhodothamniella floridula trap sediment allowing species of polychaete and amphipod to become established. 

    Sensitivity assessment. As mats of Rhodothamiella floridula occurs in wave exposed environments where sand layers are moved and deposited, the biotope is considered to have ‘High; resistance and (by dafulat) ‘High’ resilience to this pressure. The biotoe is therefore considered to be ‘Not sensitive’ to this pressure. Wave movements are likely to rapidly remove sediments preventing negative effects from shading and smothering.  However, sensitivity to deposits of fine sediments coupled with a decrease in wave action or water flow , where the deposit remains in place for an extended period would be higher. The species associated with this biotope are considered to have an equal tolerance for this pressure as they are exposed to the same levels of sediment and deposition..

    		High
    High
    Low
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    High
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Smothering and siltation rate changes (light) [Show more]

    Smothering and siltation rate changes (light)

    Benchmark. ‘Light’ deposition of up to 5 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event. Further detail

    Evidence

    No direct evidence was found to assess this pressure, however the key characterizing species, Rhodothamniella floridula, is categorised as tolerant of sediments as it is frequently found on rocky coasts with high levels of sediments, where rock surfaces are scoured and covered by sand (Airoldi, 2003).  The branched thalli is tough and the mats of Rhodothamniella floridula trap sediment allowing species of polychaete and amphipod to become established. 

    Sensitivity assessment. As mats of Rhodothamiella floridula occurs in wave exposed environments where sand layers are moved and deposited, the biotope is considered to have ‘High; resistance and (by dafulat) ‘High’ resilience to this pressure. The biotoe is therefore considered to be ‘Not sensitive’ to this pressure. Wave movements are likely to rapidly remove sediments preventing negative effects from shading and smothering.  However, sensitivity to deposits of fine sediments coupled with a decrease in wave action or water flow , where the deposit remains in place for an extended period would be higher. The species associated with this biotope are considered to have an equal tolerance for this pressure as they are exposed to the same levels of sediment and deposition.

    		High
    High
    Low
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    High
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy) [Show more]

    Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy)

    Benchmark. ‘Heavy’ deposition of up to 30 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event. Further detail

    Evidence

    No direct evidence was found to assess this pressure, however this species is categorised as tolerant of sediments as it is frequently found on rocky coasts with high levels of sediments, which are scoured and covered by sand (Airoldi, 2003).  The branched thalli is tough and the mats of Rhodothamniella floridula trap sediment allowing species of polychaete and amphipod to become established. 

    Sensitivity assessment.  The pressure benchmark refers to a thick deposit of fine sediment. Resistance to this pressure will be mediated by the length of time the deposit remains in place which will depend on water flow and wave action as well as the footprint of the pressure. If large areas of shore were impacted, wave action may merely move sediments around the beach rather than clearing them. Fine sediments are more cohesive than the sand deposits which the biotope is typically exposed to and less permeable. If covered entirely for an extended period the mats of Rhodothamniella floridula will be prevented from photosynthesising and respiring and may begin to rot. Resistance is assessed as ‘Medium’ as a proportion of the population may be lost. Resilience is assessed as ‘High’ and sensitivity is assessed as ‘Low’. The evidence is considered less applicable to the ‘heavy’ siltation pressure than the ‘low’ siltation and confidence in this pressure is therefore assessed as ‘Low’.

    		Medium
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Low
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Litter [Show more]

    Litter

    Benchmark. The introduction of man-made objects able to cause physical harm (surface, water column, seafloor or strandline). Further detail

    Evidence

    Not assessed.

    		Not Assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not assessed (NA)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Electromagnetic changes [Show more]

    Electromagnetic changes

    Benchmark. A local electric field of 1 V/m or a local magnetic field of 10 µT. Further detail

    Evidence

    No evidence.

    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Underwater noise changes [Show more]

    Underwater noise changes

    Benchmark. MSFD indicator levels (SEL or peak SPL) exceeded for 20% of days in a calendar year. Further detail

    Evidence

    Not relevant.

    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Introduction of light or shading [Show more]

    Introduction of light or shading

    Benchmark. A change in incident light via anthropogenic means. Further detail

    Evidence

    The key characterizing species Rhodothamniella floridula can occur as exposed mats on hard substratum or may occur beneath canopies of Fucus spp. which provide shade, indicating that it is tolerant of both high and low light levels. In addition, Stegenga (1978) found that tetraspores of cultured Rhodothamniella floridula (as Rhodochorton floridulum) were formed at any length of daylight, although they were most abundant at high temperatures and long days.

    Sensitivity assessment. Based on occurrence in shaded and unshaded locations and the evidence from Stegenga (1978), Rhodothamniella floridula is considered to have ‘High’ resistance and ‘High’ resilience (by default) to this pressure and the biotope is therefore considered to be ‘Not sensitive’.

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Barrier to species movement [Show more]

    Barrier to species movement

    Benchmark. A permanent or temporary barrier to species movement over ≥50% of water body width or a 10% change in tidal excursion. Further detail

    Evidence

    No direct evidence was found to assess this pressure. As the larvae of the key characterizing species and many of the other associated species are planktonic and are transported by water movements, barriers that reduce the degree of tidal excursion may alter larval supply to suitable habitats from source populations. However the presence of barriers may enhance local population supply by preventing the loss of larvae from enclosed habitats.  As the species found within this biotope are common and widely distributed, source populations and hence larval supply is likely to be plentiful (unless unsuitable habitats provide wide discontinuities), resistance to this pressure is assessed as 'High' and resilience as 'High' by default. This biotope is therefore considered to be 'Not sensitive'. 

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Death or injury by collision [Show more]

    Death or injury by collision

    Benchmark. Injury or mortality from collisions of biota with both static or moving structures due to 0.1% of tidal volume on an average tide, passing through an artificial structure. Further detail

    Evidence

    Not relevant’ to seabed habitats.  NB. Collision by grounding vessels is addressed under ‘surface abrasion'.

    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Visual disturbance [Show more]

    Visual disturbance

    Benchmark. The daily duration of transient visual cues exceeds 10% of the period of site occupancy by the feature. Further detail

    Evidence

    Not relevant.

    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help

    Biological Pressures

    Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed

    ResistanceResilienceSensitivity
    Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species [Show more]

    Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species

    Benchmark. Translocation of indigenous species or the introduction of genetically modified or genetically different populations of indigenous species that may result in changes in the genetic structure of local populations, hybridization, or change in community structure. Further detail

    Evidence

    Key characterizing species within this biotope are not cultivated or translocated. This pressure is therefore considered ‘Not relevant’ to this biotope group’.

    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Not relevant (NR)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species [Show more]

    Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species

    Benchmark. The introduction of one or more invasive non-indigenous species (INIS). Further detail

    Evidence

    Invasive non-indigenous macroalgae that could out-compete native macroalgae for space are the most likely species to negatively affect this biotope. The sand trapping mats of Rhodothamniella floridula are relatively unstable and friable and therefore unsuitable for species that require firm attachment spaces including macroalgae but especially the non-native bryozoans and tunicates such as Didemnum vexillum (many of which are still recorded only from marinas and artificial substratum than natural habitats).  

    Algal species which may have overlapping habitat requirements are the green seaweed Codium fragile subsp tormentosoides. ( now renamed as Codium fragile fragile) and the red seaweed Heterosiphonia japonica, neither  of these have so far been recorded in nuisance densities (Sweet, 2011j).

    Sargassum muticum grows best on sheltered shores and in rockpools (Sewell, 2011c), the habitats in which the Rhodothamniella floridula characterised biotope occurs are probably not suitable for this species to occur in high densities.  

    Sensitivity assessment. No information on the effects of alien species on Rhodothamniella floridula were found. Overall, there is little evidence of this biotope being adversely affected by non-native species, resistance is therefore assessed as 'High', and resilience as 'High' (by default), and the biotope is considered to be 'Not sensitive'.

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Introduction of microbial pathogens [Show more]

    Introduction of microbial pathogens

    Benchmark. The introduction of relevant microbial pathogens or metazoan disease vectors to an area where they are currently not present (e.g. Martelia refringens and Bonamia, Avian influenza virus, viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia virus). Further detail

    Evidence

    No evidence was found to assess this pressure.

    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help    		No evidence (NEv)
    NR
    NR
    NR
    Help
    Removal of target species [Show more]

    Removal of target species

    Benchmark. Removal of species targeted by fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale. Further detail

    Evidence

    The mussel Mytilus edulis is too small and patchy in this biotope to be targeted for commercial harvesting. However, some hand-gathering of this species and the edible periwinkle Littorina littorea or Patella vulgata may occur. Edible seaweeds, carrageen (Chondrus crispus) and dulse (Palmaria palmata) may also occur in low densities in the biotope and be harvested locally. As these species are present only in low densities, ecological effects such as the proliferation of algae (from removal of grazers) or other significant changes to the structure and function of the biotope are not predicted to arise from removal.

    Sensitivity assessment. This biotope is considered to have 'High' resistance to removal of targeted species by hand-gatherers and 'High' resilience (by default) and is therefore considered to be 'Not sensitive' to this pressure. It should be noted that this pressure assesses the ecological effects of removal of targeted species, direct, physical impacts arising from harvesting (abrasion from trampling) are assessed through the abrasion and penetration of the seabed pressures. 

    		High
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		High
    High
    High
    High
    Help    		Not sensitive
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help
    Removal of non-target species [Show more]

    Removal of non-target species

    Benchmark. Removal of features or incidental non-targeted catch (by-catch) through targeted fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale. Further detail

    Evidence

    The sensitivity assessment for this pressure considers any biological/ecological effects resulting from the removal of non-target species on this biotope Incidental removal of the characterizing species Rhodothamniella floridula would alter the character of the biotope. Without the trapped sand the burrowing polychaetes and amphipods associated with this biotope would be lost and some changes in the algal mat may occur.  The ecological services such as primary and secondary production and nutrient cycling associated with this biotope would also be lost.

    Sensitivity assessment.  Removal of a large percentage of the characterizing species would alter the character of the biotope, so that it was bare rock. Resistance is, therefore, assessed as ‘Low’, recovery as ‘Medium’, and sensitivity is, therefore, assessed as 'Medium' .

    		Low
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Medium
    Low
    NR
    NR
    Help    		Medium
    Low
    Low
    Low
    Help

    Bibliography

    1. Airoldi, L., 2003. The effects of sedimentation on rocky coast assemblages. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 41,161-236

    2. Boney, A.D., 1971. Sub-lethal effects of mercury on marine algae. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2, 69-71.

    3. Bowman, R.S., 1981. The morphology of Patella spp. juveniles in Britain, and some phylogenetic inferences. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 647-666.

    4. Bryan, G.W. & Gibbs, P.E., 1983. Heavy metals from the Fal estuary, Cornwall: a study of long-term contamination by mining waste and its effects on estuarine organisms. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [Occasional Publication, no. 2.]

    5. Bryan, G.W., 1984. Pollution due to heavy metals and their compounds. In Marine Ecology: A Comprehensive, Integrated Treatise on Life in the Oceans and Coastal Waters, vol. 5. Ocean Management, part 3, (ed. O. Kinne), pp.1289-1431. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    6. Burrows, E.M., 1991. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Volume 2. Chlorophyta. London: British Museum (Natural History).

    7. Cole, S., Codling, I.D., Parr, W. & Zabel, T., 1999. Guidelines for managing water quality impacts within UK European Marine sites. Natura 2000 report prepared for the UK Marine SACs Project. 441 pp., Swindon: Water Research Council on behalf of EN, SNH, CCW, JNCC, SAMS and EHS. [UK Marine SACs Project.]. Available from: http://ukmpa.marinebiodiversity.org/uk_sacs/pdfs/water_quality.pdf

    8. Connor, D.W., Brazier, D.P., Hill, T.O., & Northen, K.O., 1997b. Marine biotope classification for Britain and Ireland. Vol. 1. Littoral biotopes. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, JNCC Report no. 229, Version 97.06., Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, JNCC Report No. 230, Version 97.06.

    9. Davies, C.E. & Moss, D., 1998. European Union Nature Information System (EUNIS) Habitat Classification. Report to European Topic Centre on Nature Conservation from the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Cambridgeshire. [Final draft with further revisions to marine habitats.], Brussels: European Environment Agency.

    10. Davies, M.S., 1992. Heavy metals in seawater: effects on limpet pedal mucus production. Water Research, 26, 1691-1693.

    11. Diaz, R.J. & Rosenberg, R., 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 33, 245-303.

    12. Dixon, P.S. & Irvine, L.M., 1977. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Volume 1 Rhodophyta. Part 1 Introduction, Nemaliales, Gigartinales. London: British Museum (Natural History) London.

    13. Foster, P., Hunt, D.T.E. & Morris, A.W., 1978. Metals in an acid mine stream and estuary. Science of the Total Environment, 9, 75-86.

    14. Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1994. British prosobranch molluscs: their functional anatomy and ecology, revised and updated edition. London: The Ray Society.

    15. Glegg, G. A., Hickman, L. & Rowland, S. J., 1999. Contamination of limpets (Patella vulgata) following the Sea Empress oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 38, 119-125.

    16. Guiry, M.D. & Guiry, G.M. 2015. AlgaeBase [Online], National University of Ireland, Galway [cited 30/6/2015]. Available from: http://www.algaebase.org/

    17. Hammer, L., 1972. Anaerobiosis in marine algae and marine phanerograms. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Seaweed Symposium, Sapporo, Japan, August 8-12, 1971 (ed. K. Nisizawa, S. Arasaki, Chihara, M., Hirose, H., Nakamura V., Tsuchiya, Y.), pp. 414-419. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.

    18. Hawkins, S.J., 1981. The influence of Patella grazing on the fucoid/barnacle mosaic on moderately exposed rocky shores. Kieler Meeresforschungen, 5, 537-543.

    19. Hawkins, S.J., Southward, A.J. & Barrett, R.L., 1983. Population structure of Patella vulgata (L.) during succession on rocky shores in southwest England. Oceanologica Acta, Special Volume, 103-107.

    20. Highsmith, R.C., Rucker, T.L., Stekoll, M.S., Saupe, S.M., Lindeberg, M.R., Jenne, R.N. & Erickson, W.P., 1996. Impact of the Exxon Valdez oil spill on intertidal biota. In Proceedings of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Symposium. American Fisheries Society Symposium, no. 18, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 2-5 February 1993, (ed. S.D. Rice, R.B. Spies, D.A., Wolfe & B.A. Wright), pp.212-237.

    21. Hill, J.M., 2000. Patella vulgata. Common limpet. Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Sub-programme [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. http://www.marlin.ac.uk, 2002-06-08

    22. Hill, S., Burrows, S.J. & Hawkins, S.J., 1998. Intertidal Reef Biotopes (Volume VI). An overview of dynamics and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine Special Areas of Conservation. Oban: Scottish Association for Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project)., Scottish Association for Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project). Available from: http://ukmpa.marinebiodiversity.org/uk_sacs/pdfs/reefbiot.pdf

    23. Hiscock, K., ed. 1998. Marine Nature Conservation Review. Benthic marine ecosystems of Great Britain and the north-east Atlantic. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee.

    24. Holt, T.J., Hartnoll, R.G. & Hawkins, S.J., 1997. The sensitivity and vulnerability to man-induced change of selected communities: intertidal brown algal shrubs, Zostera beds and Sabellaria spinulosa reefs. English Nature, Peterborough, English Nature Research Report No. 234.

    25. Holt, T.J., Jones, D.R., Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G., 1995. The sensitivity of marine communities to man induced change - a scoping report. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Contract Science Report, no. 65.

    26. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 2022.  The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 22.04. [Date accessed]. Available from: https://mhc.jncc.gov.uk/

    27. Johnston, C.S., 1977. The sub-lethal effects of water-soluble extracts of oil on the fertilisation and development of Fucus serratus L. (Serrated wrack). Rapports et Proces Verbaux des Reunions. Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 171, 184-185.

    28. Lewis, J.R., 1954. Observations on a high-level population of limpets. Journal of Animal Ecology, 23, 85-100.

    29. Lewis, J.R., 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores. London: English Universities Press.

    30. Little, C. & Kitching, J.A., 1996. The Biology of Rocky Shores. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    31. Little, C., Partridge, J.C. & Teagle, L., 1991. Foraging activity of limpets in normal and abnormal tidal regimes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 537-554.

    32. Maggs, C.A. & Hommersand, M.H., 1993. Seaweeds of the British Isles: Volume 1 Rhodophycota Part 3A Ceramiales. London: Natural History Museum, Her Majesty's Stationary Office.

    33. Marchan, S., Davies, M.S., Fleming, S. & Jones, H.D., 1999. Effects of copper and zinc on the heart rate of the limpet Patella vulgata (L.) Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 123A, 89-93.

    34. Marshall, D.J. & McQuaid, C.D., 1993. Effects of hypoxia and hyposalinity on the heart beat of the intertidal limpets Patella granvlaris (Prosobranchia) and Siphonaria capensis (Pulmonata). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 106 (1), 65-68

    35. Newell, R.C., 1979. Biology of intertidal animals. Faversham: Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd.

    36. Norton, T.A., 1992. Dispersal by macroalgae. British Phycological Journal, 27, 293-301.

    37. O'Brien, P.J. & Dixon, P.S., 1976. Effects of oils and oil components on algae: a review. British Phycological Journal, 11, 115-142.

    38. Scanlan, C.M. & Wilkinson, M., 1987. The use of seaweeds in biocide toxicity testing. Part 1. The sensitivity of different stages in the life-history of Fucus and of other algae, to certain biocides. Marine Environmental Research, 21, 11-29.

    39. Schiel, D.R. & Foster, M.S., 1986. The structure of subtidal algal stands in temperate waters. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 24, 265-307.

    40. Schonbeck, M.W. & Norton, T.A., 1978. Factors controlling the upper limits of fucoid algae on the shore. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 31, 303-313.

    41. Sewell, J. 2011c. Wireweed, Sargassum muticum. Great Britain Non-native Species Secretariat. [cited 16/06/2015]. Available from: <http://www.nonnativespecies.org

    42. Smith, J.E. (ed.), 1968. 'Torrey Canyon'. Pollution and marine life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    43. Southward, A.J., Hawkins, S.J. & Burrows, M.T., 1995. Seventy years observations of changes in distribution and abundance of zooplankton and intertidal organisms in the western English Channel in relation to rising sea temperature. Journal of Thermal Biology, 20, 127-155.

    44. Stegenga, H., 1978. The life histories of Rhodochorton purpureum and Rhodochorton floridulum (Rhodophyta, Nemiales) in culture. British Phycological Journal, 13, 279-289.

    45. Strömgren, T., 1979b. The effect of zinc on the increase in length of five species of intertidal Fucales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 40, 95-102.

    46. Strömgren, T., 1980a. The effect of dissolved copper on the increase in length of four species of intertidal fucoid algae. Marine Environmental Research, 3, 5-13.

    47. Strömgren, T., 1980b. The effect of lead, cadmium and mercury on the increase in length of five intertidal Fucales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 43, 107-119.

    48. Sweet, N.S. 2011j. Green sea-fingers (tomentosoides), Codium fragile subsp. tomentosoides. Great Britain Non-native Species Secretariat. [cited 16/06/2015]. Available from: <http://www.nonnativespecies.org

    49. Tyler-Walters, H., 2008b. Corallina officinalis Coral weed. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: http://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1364

    50. Vadas, R.L., Johnson, S. & Norton, T.A., 1992. Recruitment and mortality of early post-settlement stages of benthic algae. British Phycological Journal, 27, 331-351.

    51. Vidaver, W., 1972. Dissolved gases - plants. In Marine Ecology. Volume 1. Environmental factors (3), (ed. O. Kinne), 1471-1490. Wiley-Interscience, London.

    52. Widdows, J. & Donkin, P., 1992. Mussels and environmental contaminants: bioaccumulation and physiological aspects. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture, (ed. E.M. Gosling), pp. 383-424. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25]

    53. Zwaan de, A. & Mathieu, M., 1992. Cellular biochemistry and endocrinology. In The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture, (ed. E.M. Gosling), pp. 223-307. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. [Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science, no. 25]

    Citation

    This review can be cited as:

    Tillin, H.M. & Riley, K., 2016. Rhodothamniella floridula on sand-scoured lower eulittoral rock. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. [cited 30-11-2024]. Available from: https://marlin.ac.uk/habitat/detail/12

     Download PDF version

    Last Updated: 30/03/2016