BIOTIC Species Information for Dipturus batis
| |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Researched by | Ken Neal & Paolo Pizzolla | Data supplied by | MarLIN | ||||||||||||
Refereed by | This information is not refereed. | ||||||||||||||
Taxonomy | |||||||||||||||
Scientific name | Dipturus batis | Common name | Common Skate | ||||||||||||
MCS Code | ZF86 | Recent Synonyms | Raja batis | ||||||||||||
Phylum | Chordata | Subphylum | Pisces | ||||||||||||
Superclass | Gnathostomata | Class | Chondrichthyes | ||||||||||||
Subclass | Elasmobranchii | Order | Rajiformes | ||||||||||||
Suborder | Family | Rajidae | |||||||||||||
Genus | Dipturus | Species | batis | ||||||||||||
Subspecies | |||||||||||||||
Additional Information | Following a report in recent taxonomic literature, this species now belongs to the genus Dipturus, although may still be referred to as Raja in some texts, (see McEachran & Dunn, 1988). | ||||||||||||||
Taxonomy References | Hayward & Ryland, 1995b, Muus & Dahlstrom, 1974, McEachran et al., 1998, Howson & Picton, 1997, Dipper, 2001, | ||||||||||||||
General Biology | |||||||||||||||
Growth form | Pisciform |
Feeding method | Predator |
||||||||||||
Mobility/Movement | Swimmer |
Environmental position | Demersal |
||||||||||||
Typical food types | Bristle worms, sand eels, crabs and flatfish | Habit | Free living | ||||||||||||
Bioturbator | Flexibility | Low (10-45 degrees) | |||||||||||||
Fragility | Intermediate | Size | Large(>50cm) | ||||||||||||
Height | Growth Rate | 0.9 - 14 kg/year | |||||||||||||
Adult dispersal potential | 100-1000m | Dependency | Independent | ||||||||||||
Sociability | Solitary | ||||||||||||||
Toxic/Poisonous? | No | ||||||||||||||
General Biology Additional Information | The growth rate listed above may seem quite rapid but if weight at maturity is taken into consideration, 54 kg for males (Muus & Dahlstrom, 1974) and 94 kg for females (Walker & Hislop 1998) it can be seen that it takes many years to reach maturity. The data for growth rate came from tag and release studies off the west coast of Scotland (Sutcliffe, 1994; Little, 1995, 1998) by comparing weight change of skate between captures. Skates seem to have a start-and-stop growth pattern, where they have rapid growth for a short period and then remain at that weight for some time with no growth until they have another episode of rapid growth (Sutcliffe, 1994). | ||||||||||||||
Biology References | Muus & Dahlstrom, 1974, Sutcliffe, 1994, Walker & Hislop, 1998, Brander, 1981, Little, 1998, Little, 1995, Mitchell & Gallagher, 2000, Anon, 1999vii, | ||||||||||||||
Distribution and Habitat | |||||||||||||||
Distribution in Britain & Ireland | Populations of Dipturus batis are found off the coasts of Isles of Scilly, western British Channel, west and north Ireland and west Scotland. | ||||||||||||||
Global distribution | Atlantic coasts from Madeira and northern Morocco northward to Iceland including the North Sea. Also in western part of the Baltic and western and northern Mediterranean. | ||||||||||||||
Biogeographic range | Not researched | Depth range | 10 to 600 m | ||||||||||||
Migratory | Non-migratory / Resident | ||||||||||||||
Distribution Additional Information | Dipturus batis was found around all British and Irish coasts except the south east. However, it has disappeared from much of its former range due to fishing pressure (Brander, 1981, Walker & Hislop, 1998; Jennings et al., 1999; Rogers & Ellis, 2000). Remnant populations occur in areas unsuitable for commercial fishing (Shark Trust pers. comm.). | ||||||||||||||
Substratum preferences | Muddy gravel Coarse clean sand Fine clean sand Sandy mud Muddy sand Mud Mixed |
Physiographic preferences | Open coast Offshore seabed |
||||||||||||
Biological zone | Upper Infralittoral Lower Infralittoral Upper Circalittoral Lower Circalittoral |
Wave exposure | Very Exposed Exposed Moderately Exposed Sheltered Very Sheltered |
||||||||||||
Tidal stream strength/Water flow | Strong (3-6 kn) Moderately Strong (1-3 kn) Weak (<1 kn) Very Weak (negligible) |
Salinity | Full (30-40 psu) |
||||||||||||
Habitat Preferences Additional Information | |||||||||||||||
Distribution References | Hayward & Ryland, 1995b, Muus & Dahlstrom, 1974, Dipper, 2001, Walker & Hislop, 1998, Brander, 1981, JNCC, 1999, Rogers & Ellis, 2000, Whitehead et al., 1986, Jennings et al. 1999, | ||||||||||||||
Reproduction/Life History | |||||||||||||||
Reproductive type | Gonochoristic |
Developmental mechanism | Oviparous |
||||||||||||
Reproductive Season | Insufficient information | Reproductive Location | See additional information | ||||||||||||
Reproductive frequency | Biannual episodic | Regeneration potential | No | ||||||||||||
Life span | 51-100 years | Age at reproductive maturity | 11-20 years | ||||||||||||
Generation time | 11-20 years | Fecundity | Up to 40 eggs | ||||||||||||
Egg/propagule size | 15-25 cm long, 8-15 cm wide | Fertilization type | Insufficient information | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Reproduction Preferences Additional Information | Females breed every other year (Little, 1997) and produce up to 40 eggs (Walker & Hislop, 1998) which are laid in sandy gravel in the spring and summer (Whitehead et al., 1984). The egg case is large, 15-25 cm long and 8-15 cm wide (Dipper, 2001). It is rectangular and similar to 'mermaids purses' that are often found on the strandline. Eggcases are laid on the seabed and have been reported as being 'loose' on the seabed and perhaps very vaguely 'wedged' in between rocks (Paul Kay, pers. comm.). The young hatch after 2-5 months (depending on temperature) (Muus & Dahlstrom, 1974) at about 22 cm in length (Brander, 1981). Dipturus batis is vulnerable to overfishing because of its slow growth, late maturity and low fecundity (Brander, 1981; Jennings et al, 1999). Only about 40 eggs are laid every other year and each generation takes 11 years to reach maturity, therefore populations cannot recover quickly from large mortalities. It has been estimated that a mortality of greater than 38% per year will lead to continual decline in the population and recovery is unlikely to occur until mortality is relaxed (Walker & Hislop, 1998). Numbers of common skate caught in trawls began to decline in the 1920s and again in the 1950s after a recovery period during the second World War and disappeared from the North Sea between the mid 1950s and early 1980s (Walker & Hislop, 1998). However, it has been shown that Dipturus batis can survive being trawled if it is released after capture (Little, 1995) . Dipturus batis was recorded as 'not uncommon in trawls' in the Marine fauna of the Isle of Man (Bruce et al., 1963) and was regarded as a common species by Hureau & Monod (1979). However the common skate had become all but extinct by the late 1970s (Brander, 1981). Similarly, between 1901 and 1907, the common skate made up 4% of all elasmobranchs caught in trawls in southwest England but between 1989 and 1997 none were caught (Rogers & Ellis, 2000). A tag and recapture program has been implemented in northeastern Scotland. Of 147 recaptured individuals, only 5 had travelled more than 20 km (Little, 1998), which suggests that Dipturus batis is vulnerable to local extinction by fishing with little chance of re-population from adjacent areas. |
||||||||||||||
Reproduction References | Muus & Dahlstrom, 1974, Dipper, 2001, Sutcliffe, 1994, Walker & Hislop, 1998, Brander, 1981, Little, 1998, Little, 1995, Hureau & Monod (1973), Rogers & Ellis, 2000, Little, 1997, Whitehead et al., 1986, Bruce et al., 1963, |