BIOTIC Species Information for Arctica islandica
| |||
---|---|---|---|
Researched by | Lizzie Tyler | Data supplied by | University of Sheffield |
Refereed by | This information is not refereed. | ||
General Biology | |||
Growth form | Bivalved |
Feeding method | Passive suspension feeder Active suspension feeder Surface deposit feeder Sub-surface deposit feeder |
Mobility/Movement | Burrower |
Environmental position | Infaunal |
Typical food types | Phytoplankton | Habit | Burrow dwelling |
Bioturbator | Flexibility | None (< 10 degrees) | |
Fragility | Intermediate | Size | Medium(11-20 cm) |
Height | Insufficient information | Growth Rate | Average 0-1.5 mm / year (Whitsand Bay) |
Adult dispersal potential | 100-1000m | Dependency | Independent |
Sociability | Solitary | ||
Toxic/Poisonous? | No | ||
General Biology Additional Information | Growth The growth rate of Arctica islandica is very slow and highly variable. Internal growth bands visible in cross-sections of the valves and hinge plates of Arctica islandica are deposited annually, possibly in response to the reproductive cycle of Arctica islandica (Thompson et al., 1980a). The presence of these annual growth rings on the shell of Arctica islandica allows individuals to be aged. The following ages have been recorded:
Abundance Biomass / Production Respiration Arctica islandica has only short siphons and siphonal contact with the water cannot be maintained when they burrow several centimetres beneath the sea bed. When this occurs they are able to respire anaerobically. No obvious rhythmic pattern has been detected but these periods of inactivity can last up to 10 days (Taylor, 1976). The heart rate of Arctica islandica after long periods of shell closure usually takes over 20 hours to return to normal (in Mytilus edulis this is accomplished in a few minutes). This behaviour in Arctica islandica is apparently self induced (Oeschger, 1990) since no stimulus that initiates either burrowing or a return to the surface has been identified. It was suggested that this behaviour is a likely response to hypoxic conditions however, previous studies showed that Arctica islandica was readily able to deal with hypoxic conditions. Other suggestions for this self induced burrowing behaviour included saving energy and a reduction in the risk of predation, as Arctica islandica would be less accessible to potential predators such as large starfish. However, more knowledge of their ecology is required (Taylor, 1976). |
||
Biology References | Fish & Fish, 1996, Rees & Dare, 1993, Taylor, 1976, Cargnelli et al., 1999a, Ropes & Murawski, 1983, Thompson et al., 1980b, Witbaard & Bergman, 2003, Thompson et al., 1980a, Thorarinsdóttir, 1999, Oeschger, 1990, Lauckner, 1983, Hayward & Ryland, 1990, Julie Bremner, unpub data, |