BIOTIC Species Information for Chondrus crispus
| |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Researched by | Will Rayment and Paolo Pizzola | Data supplied by | MarLIN | ||||||||||||
Refereed by | Dr Stefan Kraan | ||||||||||||||
Taxonomy | |||||||||||||||
Scientific name | Chondrus crispus | Common name | Carrageen | ||||||||||||
MCS Code | ZM345 | Recent Synonyms | None | ||||||||||||
Phylum | Rhodophycota | Subphylum | |||||||||||||
Superclass | Class | Rhodophyceae | |||||||||||||
Subclass | Florideophycidae | Order | Gigartinales | ||||||||||||
Suborder | Family | Gigartinaceae | |||||||||||||
Genus | Chondrus | Species | crispus | ||||||||||||
Subspecies | |||||||||||||||
Additional Information | Also known as Irish moss. Together with Mastocarpus stellatus, Chondrus crispus is harvested commercially as carrageen to be used in the pharmaceutical and food industries. May be confused with Mastocarpus stellatus, although the latter species has a rounded stipe, channeled fronds and papillate reproductive bodies. | ||||||||||||||
Taxonomy References | Fish & Fish, 1996, Dickinson, 1963, Dixon & Irvine, 1977, | ||||||||||||||
General Biology | |||||||||||||||
Growth form | Turf |
Feeding method | Photoautotroph |
||||||||||||
Mobility/Movement | Permanent attachment |
Environmental position | Epilithic |
||||||||||||
Typical food types | Not relevant | Habit | Attached | ||||||||||||
Bioturbator | Not relevant | Flexibility | High (>45 degrees) | ||||||||||||
Fragility | Robust | Size | Medium-large(21-50cm) | ||||||||||||
Height | Growth Rate | 0.33 mm/day | |||||||||||||
Adult dispersal potential | None | Dependency | Independent | ||||||||||||
Sociability | Solitary | ||||||||||||||
Toxic/Poisonous? | No | ||||||||||||||
General Biology Additional Information | Size at maturity Surprisingly little information was found concerning size at maturity. Pybus (1977) estimated that Chondrus crispus from Galway Bay, Ireland, reached maturity approximately 2 years after the initiation of the basal disc, at which stage, the fronds were approximately 12 cm in length.
Growth
Supports which species |
||||||||||||||
Biology References | Dickinson, 1963, Dixon & Irvine, 1977, Pybus, 1977, Prince & Kingsbury, 1973, Tasende & Fraga, 1999, Juanes & McLachlan, 1992, Chopin et al., 1999, Fortes & Lüning, 1980, Simpson & Shacklock, 1979, Kuebler & Dudgeon, 1996, Hurlbut, 1991, Shacklock & Doyle, 1983, Chapman & Goudey, 1983, Aguirre-von-Wobeser et al., 2000, Bird et al., 1979, | ||||||||||||||
Distribution and Habitat | |||||||||||||||
Distribution in Britain & Ireland | Widely distributed on rocky shores on all British and Irish coasts. | ||||||||||||||
Global distribution | See additional information. | ||||||||||||||
Biogeographic range | Not researched | Depth range | mid eulittoral, exceptionally to 24 m | ||||||||||||
Migratory | Non-migratory / Resident | ||||||||||||||
Distribution Additional Information | In Galway Bay, Ireland, Chondrus crispus occurs in relatively stable conditions. The annual variation in sea surface temperature was 10-16°C and in salinity was 32-35 psu (Pybus, 1977). However, the species is capable of existing in much more variable environments. In New Hampshire, USA, Chondrus crispus formed its most extensive populations on the open coast on massive outcrops and boulders in the shallow subtidal (3 to 5 metres deep) (Mathieson & Burns, 1975). The annual variation in sea surface temperatures was -1 to 19°C. The species also occurred in an estuarine tidal rapid experiencing currents up to 5.5 knots and salinity fluctuations from 16-32 psu (Mathieson & Burns, 1975). Global distribution |
||||||||||||||
Substratum preferences | Bedrock Large to very large boulders Small boulders Rockpools |
Physiographic preferences | Open coast Strait / sound Estuary Enclosed coast / Embayment |
||||||||||||
Biological zone | Mid Eulittoral Lower Eulittoral Sublittoral Fringe Upper Circalittoral Upper Infralittoral Lower Infralittoral |
Wave exposure | Exposed Moderately Exposed Sheltered |
||||||||||||
Tidal stream strength/Water flow | Strong (3-6 kn) Moderately Strong (1-3 kn) Weak (<1 kn) Very Weak (negligible) |
Salinity | Full (30-40 psu) Variable (18-40 psu) |
||||||||||||
Habitat Preferences Additional Information | |||||||||||||||
Distribution References | Fish & Fish, 1996, Dickinson, 1963, Hiscock, 1986b, Dixon & Irvine, 1977, Pybus, 1977, Mathieson & Burns, 1975, Hardy & Guiry, 2003, Mann, 1972, Guiry & Nic Dhonncha, 2002, | ||||||||||||||
Reproduction/Life History | |||||||||||||||
Reproductive type | Alternation of generations Vegetative |
Developmental mechanism | Spores (sexual / asexual) |
||||||||||||
Reproductive Season | Insufficient information | Reproductive Location | As adult | ||||||||||||
Reproductive frequency | Annual protracted | Regeneration potential | No | ||||||||||||
Life span | 6-10 years | Age at reproductive maturity | 1-2 years | ||||||||||||
Generation time | 1-2 years | Fecundity | See additional information | ||||||||||||
Egg/propagule size | Insufficient information | Fertilization type | Insufficient information | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Reproduction Preferences Additional Information | Life span The fronds of Chondrus crispus typically have a life of 2-3 years (Taylor, cited in Pringle & Mathieson, 1986) but may live up to 6 years in sheltered waters (Harvey & McLachlan, 1973). The holdfast is much longer lived (Taylor, cited in Pringle & Mathieson, 1986) and is capable of regenerating new fronds after disturbance (Mathieson & Burns, 1975; Dudgeon & Johnson, 1992). Fecundity Fernandez & Menendez (1991) reported that reproductive capacity was similar for both gametophytes and tetrasporophytes in northern Spain, the estimated number of spores being 8 x 1010/m²/year. The greater number of fertile gametophytes was counterbalanced by the high numbers of tetrasporangial sori and tetraspores. Timing of reproduction Dickinson (1963) reported that Chondrus crispus was fertile in the UK from autumn to spring, but that the exact timings varied according to local environment. Similarly, Pybus (1977) reported that although carposporic plants were present throughout the year in Galway Bay, Ireland, maximum reproduction occurred in the winter and estimated that settling of spores occurred between January and May. In northern Spain, Chondrus crispus had reproductive capacity all year round but was greatest for gametophytes between November and March and for tetrasporophytes in April (Fernandez & Menendez, 1991). In Nova Scotia, Canada, cystocarps and tetrasporangia have been recorded on Chondrus crispus all year round with a reproductive peak from August to October (Scrosati et al., 1994). However, spores failed to germinate below 5°C and so winter temperatures in Nova Scotia are unsuitable for spore germination. It was suggested therefore that simple counts of spore production do not adequately model reproductive potential (Scrosati et al., 1994). Scrosati et al. (1994) also commented that viability of spores was low (<30%) and suggested that reproduction by spores probably does not contribute much to maintenance of the intertidal population of Chondrus crispus in Nova Scotia, compared to vegetative growth of gametophytes. |
||||||||||||||
Reproduction References | Dickinson, 1963, Dixon & Irvine, 1977, Pybus, 1977, Prince & Kingsbury, 1973, Tasende & Fraga, 1999, Juanes & McLachlan, 1992, Chopin et al., 1999, Fortes & Lüning, 1980, Simpson & Shacklock, 1979, Kuebler & Dudgeon, 1996, Mathieson & Burns, 1975, Dudgeon & Johnson, 1992, Pringle & Mathieson, 1986, Harvey & McLachlan, 1973, Fernandez & Menendez, 1991, Scrosati et al., 1994, |