The Marine Life Information Network

Temperature increase (local)

Benchmark. A 5°C increase in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year. Further detail

Evidence

Ophiothrix fragilis is widely distributed in the eastern Atlantic from Norway to South Africa and both Ophiocomina nigra and Ophiura albida from Norway to the Azores and Mediterranean (Hayward & Ryland, 1995b). Other component species in the biotopes also have a widespread distribution in the north east Atlantic. Consequently, these species are exposed to temperatures both above and below those found in the British Isles and their distribution is not limited by temperature. In the Dutch Oosterschelde Estuary fluctuations in the abundance of Ophiothrix fragilis between 1979 and 1990 appeared to be driven by winter temperatures (Leewis et al., 1994). When winter temperatures increased in 1979-80 and 1987-88, populations of brittlestars increased enormously, and occupied 60-90% of the available hard substratum in layers up to 5 cm deep. Populations were reduced to less than 10% following the cold winters in 1978-79, 1984-85 and 1985-86. Thus, increases in temperature may be beneficial to populations. However, short-term acute changes in temperature are noted to cause a reduction in the loading of subcutaneous symbiotic bacteria in echinoderms such as Ophiothrix fragilis. Reductions in these bacteria are probably indicative of levels of stress and may lead to mortality (Newton & McKenzie, 1995).

Coralline crusts and Caryophyllia smithii characterize the biotope CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri. Coralline crusts are found further south than the UK and are considered to tolerate increased temperatures. Edyvean & Ford (1984b) suggested that populations of Lithophyllum incrustans are affected by temperature changes and salinity and that temperature and salinity ‘shocks’ induce spawning but no information on thresholds was provided (Edyvean & Ford, 1984b). Wilson (1975) suggested that Caryophillia smithii appears to tolerate a wide range of variation in parameters, including temperature. However, although mature examples of Caryophyllia smithii were recorded in Greece by Koukouras (2010), unseasonal increases in temperature may disrupt the natural reproductive processes and negatively influence recruitment patterns given that gamete release is most likely triggered by seasonal temperature increases (Tranter et al., 1982).

Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula, that occur in CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, are both widely distributed, and appear to tolerate a broad range of temperatures. Tolerance to increases in temperature may vary among geographical populations or ecotypes. Adult Ciona intestionalis is reported as tolerant of temperatures up to 30°C (Dybern, 1965; Therriault & Herborg, 2008), although Petersen & Riisgard (1992) noted that filtration rates declined above 21°C which suggested thermal stress. The effect of higher temperatures on Ascidia mentula is not as well researched but studies by Glantz (2005) found that increases in temperature could be associated with an increase in population density across all sites in the study.

Sensitivity assessment. The distribution of Ophiothrix fragilis and Ophiocomina nigra, suggests that they are likely to be tolerant of an acute or chronic temperature increase at the pressure benchmark. Resistance is assessed as ‘High’ and resilience as ‘High’ (by default), so the biotopes are therefore considered to be ‘Not sensitive’ at the pressure benchmark.

Temperature decrease (local)

Benchmark. A 5°C decrease in temperature for one month, or 2°C for one year. Further detail

Evidence

Ophiothrix fragilis is widely distributed in the eastern Atlantic from Norway to South Africa and both Ophiocomina nigra and Ophiura albida from Norway to the Azores and Mediterranean (Hayward & Ryland, 1995b). Other component species in the biotopes also have a widespread distribution in the north east Atlantic. Consequently, these species are exposed to temperatures both above and below those found in the British Isles with distribution not limited by temperature. In the Dutch Oosterschelde Estuary fluctuations in the abundance of Ophiothrix fragilis between 1979 and 1990 appeared to be driven by winter temperatures (Leewis et al., 1994). When winter temperatures increased in 1979-80 and 1987-88, populations of brittlestars increased enormously, and occupied 60-90% of the available hard substratum in layers up to 5 cm deep. Populations were reduced to less than 10% following the cold winters in 1978-79, 1984-85 and 1985-86. Thus, decreases in temperature may affect population densities. Short-term acute changes in temperature are noted to cause a reduction in the loading of subcutaneous symbiotic bacteria in echinoderms such as Ophiothrix fragilis. Reductions in these bacteria are probably indicative of levels of stress and may lead to mortality (Newton & McKenzie, 1995).

Coralline crusts and Caryophyllia smithii characterize the biotope CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri. Coralline crusts have a wide northern distribution in the UK, so communities in the middle of its range are likely to tolerate a decrease in temperature. Wilson (1975) suggested that Caryophillia smithii appears to tolerate a wide range of variation in parameters, including temperature. However, unseasonal decreases in temperature may disrupt the natural reproductive processes and negatively influence recruitment patterns given that gamete release is most likely triggered by temperature (Tranter et al., 1982). Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula, that occur in CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, are both widely distributed, and appear to tolerate a broad range of temperatures. However, tolerance to decreases in temperature may vary among geographical populations or ecotypes. Svane (1984) found that lower temperatures decreased recruitment of Ascidia mentula in Sweden.

Sensitivity assessment. The distribution of Ophiothrix fragilis and Ophiocomina nigra, the characterizing species of these biotopes are considered likely to be tolerant of an acute or chronic decrease in temperature at the pressure benchmark. Thus, resistance is assessed as ‘High’ and resilience as ‘High’ (by default) and the biotopes are therefore considered to be ‘Not Sensitive’ at the pressure benchmark. 

Salinity increase (local)

Benchmark. A increase in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat. Further detail

Evidence

Echinoderms are stenohaline owing to the lack of an excretory organ and a poor ability to osmo- and ion-regulate (Stickle & Diehl, 1987; Russell, 2013) and unable to tolerate wide fluctuations in salinity. A review by Russell (2013) confirmed that Ophiothrix fragilis and Ophiocomina nigra have not been previously recorded in hypersaline conditions, although Pagett (1981) suggested that echinoderms may exhibit localised physiological adaption to reduced or variable salinities in near shore areas subject to freshwater runoffs. However, a circalittoral habitat is less likely to experience variable salinities, and resident species, therefore, less likely to be adapted to variation in salinity, as suggested by the results given by Pagett (1981).

Although crustose corallines are found in rockpools, where salinities may fluctuate markedly during exposure to the air, Edyvean & Ford (1984b) suggested that populations of Lithophyllum incrustans are affected by temperature changes and salinity and that temperature and salinity ‘shocks’ induced spawning but no information on thresholds was provided. Additionally the authors observed that populations of Lithophyllum incrustans were less stable in rockpools with a smaller volume of water that were more exposed to temperature and salinity changes due to lower buffering capacity. Wilson (1975) noted that Caryophillia smithii appears to tolerate a wide range of variation in parameters, including salinity. Both these species characterize the biotope CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri.

Ciona intestinalis has been classified as euryhaline with a high salinity tolerance range (12-40‰) although it typically occurs in full salinity conditions (>30‰) (Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014). Ciona intestinalis has been found in salinities ranging from 11 to 33 PSU in Sweden, although the same study found that parent acclimation to salinity (high or low) has an overriding and significant effect on larval metamorphic success, independent of parent origins (Renborg et al., 2014). No information on Ascidia spp. was found. Both these species characterize the biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri.

Sensitivity assessment. There is little direct evidence of the effects of hypersaline conditions on Ophiothrix fragilis and Ophiocomina nigra. However, echinoderms are generally considered to be stenohaline (Stickle & Diehl, 1987; Russell, 2013).Therefore, an increase in salinity to >40 psu is likely to result in mortality and resistance is assessed as ‘Low’ but with low confidence. Resilience is probably ‘Medium’ so that sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’.

Salinity decrease (local)

Benchmark. A decrease in one MNCR salinity category above the usual range of the biotope or habitat. Further detail

Evidence

Echinoderms are stenohaline owing to the lack of an excretory organ and a poor ability to osmo- and ion-regulate (Stickle & Diehl, 1987; Russell, 2013). This means that they are unable to tolerate wide fluctuations in salinity. Although brittlestar beds are generally found in fully marine conditions, Wolff (1968) observed dense aggregations of Ophiothrix fragilis occurring in salinities of 16 psu and even persisting down to 10 psu in the Oosterschelde Estuary. Russell (2013) reported that Ophiocomina nigra and Ophiura albida can tolerate 27.6‰ and 20‰ in experiments, respectively. Pagett (1981) suggested that localised physiological adaption to reduced or variable salinities may occur in near shore areas subject to freshwater runoffs However, a circalittoral habitat is less likely to experience variable salinities, and resident species, therefore, less likely to adapt to variation in salinity, as suggested by the results given by Pagett (1981).

Although crustose corallines are found in rockpools, where salinities may fluctuate markedly during exposure to the air, Edyvean & Ford (1984b) suggested that populations of Lithophyllum incrustans are affected by temperature changes and salinity and that temperature and salinity ‘shocks’ induce spawning, but no information on thresholds was provided. Additionally the authors observed that populations of Lithophyllum incrustans were less stable in rockpools with a smaller volume of water that were more exposed to temperature and salinity changes due to lower buffering capacity. Wilson (1975) noted that Caryophillia smithii appears to tolerate a wide range of variation in parameters, including salinity. Both these species characterize the biotope CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri.

Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula are typically found in full salinity conditions, but both have been found in lower salinities. Ciona intestinalis has been reported in Scandinavian waters in salinities as low as 11 ‰ (Renborg et al., 2014; Dybern, 1967). Ascidia mentula has been found in a brackish lake in Corsica with a salinity gradient of 6.5 to 18.5 ‰ Cl^- (Verhoeven & Van Vierssen, 1978). However, studies by Lambert & Lambert (1998) and Caputi et al. (2015) have suggested that mortality of Ciona intestinalis in California and in the Mediterranean, respectively, could be associated with low salinities, and adult acclimation to salinity was shown to have an overriding and significant effect on larval metamorphic success, independent of parent origins (Renborg et al., 2014). Both these species characterize the biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri.

Sensitivity assessment. The evidence suggests that a decrease in salinity may result in significant mortality of the biotopes’ defining species, Ophiothrix fragilis, especially as populations in the circalittoral may not be adapted to tolerate variations in salinity. Resistance is therefore assessed as ‘Low’ and resilience as ‘Medium’. Sensitivity is therefore assessed as ‘Medium’.

Water flow (tidal current) changes (local)

Benchmark. A change in peak mean spring bed flow velocity of between 0.1 m/s to 0.2 m/s for more than one year. Further detail

Evidence

Dense brittlestar beds are found in a range of water flows from sea lochs with restricted water flows to higher-energy environments on open coastlines (Connor et al., 2004). In the Dover Strait, Ophiothrix beds experience current speeds of up to 1.5 m/s during average spring tides (Davoult & Gounin, 1995). Davoult & Gounin (1995) found that current speeds below 0.2 m/s were optimal for suspension feeding by Ophiothrix fragilis. If the velocity exceeded 0.3 m/s the animals ceased feeding, flattening themselves against the substratum and linking arms, so increasing their collective stability in the current. These values agree with those found by Warner (1971).

Similarly strong tidal streams (1.0-1.2 m/s) were also recorded over beds in the Isle of Man (Brun, 1969). In both locations (Isle of Man and the Dover Strait), Ophiothrix densities of up to 2000 individuals/m² were recorded. Hughes (1998b) suggested that high density aggregations could probably only be maintained where strong currents can supply enough suspended food. Food requirements probably set a lower limit on the current regime of areas able to support brittlestar beds. However, above a certain water speed (0.25 m/s) the feeding arms are withdrawn from the water column (Warner & Woodley, 1975; Hiscock, 1983). At water speeds above about 0.28 m/s individuals or even small groups may be displaced from the substratum and they have been observed being rolled along the seabed by the current (Warner, 1971). Living in dense aggregations may reduce displacement by strong currents (Warner & Woodley, 1975). Ophiocomina nigra is usually found in fairly sheltered sites with some water movement, and within these biotopes tends to become more dominant in deeper water than Ophiothrix (Connor et al., 2004), which suggests a lower resistance to changes in water flow.

Parasmittina trispinosa, the coralline crusts and ascidians are characterizing species of the biotopes CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri and CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, respectively, and are flat and securely attached, so likely to be subjected to little or no drag. However, where a change in tidal current includes a significant and prolonged decrease in water flow, the groups may be affected by a reduction of nutrient supply and possible deposition of sediment (see siltation pressure). In the case of the low energy biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, an increase in water flow rate may impact on the characterizing species of this biotope Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula due to lower tolerance to physical damage by scour.

Caryophyllia smithii, that occurs in CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri, like other suspension feeders in these biotopes, relies on water currents to supply food. Additionally, it is capable of living in strong to weak currents and, although feeding in particular might be affected, it is not thought that individuals will be killed by increases or decreases in flow rate (Tillin & Hull, 2013g).

Sensitivity assessment. The evidence available suggests that brittlestars have behavioural adaptations to changes in water flow (Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014). Increased flow rates, increases suspension and transport of organic particles and can enhance feeding rates. If the flow is too strong, brittlestars may flatten, link arms, or withdraw arms into sediment. At lower flow rates species may switch to deposit feeding. Thus, although brittlestar beds can tolerate increased water flow over tidal cycles a long-term increase will probably prevent the population feeding and over a period of a year this is likely to cause the loss of the population. A decrease in water flow could potentially have an effect on some of the characterizing species of the biotopes and may alter species richness as a result of sediment deposition. These are not considered to alter the character of the biotopes. However, these brittlestar dominated biotopes occur in a range of water flows, so the change in the water flow experienced by mid-range populations of the characterizing species is unlikely to have an impact at the pressure benchmark. The biotopes are considered to have ‘High’ resistance and ‘High’ resilience, and are therefore assessed as ‘Not Sensitive’ at the benchmark level.

Emergence regime changes

Benchmark.  1) A change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of ≥1 year or 2) an increase in relative sea level or decrease in high water level for ≥1 year. Further detail

Evidence

Changes in emergence are 'Not Relevant' to these biotopes, which are restricted to fully subtidal/circalittoral conditions. The pressure benchmark is relevant only to littoral and shallow sublittoral fringe biotopes. 

Wave exposure changes (local)

Benchmark. A change in near shore significant wave height of >3% but <5% for more than one year. Further detail

Evidence

Records indicate that CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri, and CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr.Bri occur within a range of wave exposure categories, from moderate to extreme wave exposure (Connor et al., 2004). Connor et al. (2004) also suggested that the depth at which the biotopes occur means that wave action was not severe on the seabed as to displace the dense mat of brittlestars. CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri occurs in low energy areas, in moderate to very sheltered wave exposure (Connor et al., 2004), although it probably occurs at greater depth in areas of moderate wave exposure. Therefore, an increase in wave action, and/or the frequency of storms may be detrimental to the brittlestar beds in this variant. A decrease may increase siltation and limit food supply for the dominant suspension feeding community but only where tidal flow is also reduced.

Sensitivity assessment: An increase or decrease in wave height at the pressure benchmark is unlikely to be significant in wave exposed examples of the biotopes. As brittlestar beds require strong to moderate water movements, water flow is probably a more important source of water movement in sheltered examples of the biotopes. Therefore, brittlestar beds probably have a 'High' resistance to a change in significant wave height at the pressure benchmark. Resilience is assessed as ‘High’, by default, and the biotopes are considered ‘Not sensitive’ at the benchmark level. The low energy biotope AmenCio.Bri occurs in sheltered sea lochs with little water flow but is recorded in moderately exposed conditions, so that the brittlestar bed itself, is probably still ‘Not sensitive’ at the benchmark level. 

Transition elements & organo-metal contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

Adult echinoderms such as Ophiothrix fragilis are known to be efficient concentrators of heavy metals including those that are biologically active and toxic (Ag, Zn, Cd and Co) (Hutchins et al., 1996). There is no information available regarding the effects of this bioaccumulation. Gounin et al. (1995) studied the transfer of heavy metals (Fe, Mn, Pb, Cu and Cd) through Ophiothrix beds. They concluded that heavy metals ingested or absorbed by the animals transited rapidly through the body and were expelled in the faeces and did not appear to accumulate in their tissues. Studies by Deheyn & Latz (2006) at the Bay of San Diego found that heavy metal accumulation in brittlestars occurs both through dissolved metals as well as through diet, to the arms and disc, respectively. Similarly, Sbaihat et al. (2013) measured concentrations of heavy metals (Cu, Ni, Cd, Co, Cr and Pb) in the body of Ophiocoma scolopendrina collected from the Gulf of Aqaba, and found that most concentration was found in the central disc rather than arms and no simple correlations could be found between contaminant and body length. It is logical to suppose that brittlestar beds would be adversely affected by major pollution incidents such as oil spills, or by continuous exposure to toxic metals, pesticides, or the antiparasite chemicals used in cage aquaculture. So far, however, there are no field observations of epifaunal brittlestar beds being damaged by any of these forms of pollution, and there seems to be no evidence of the toxicity effects of heavy metal accumulation on brittlestars.

Regarding the remaining characterizing species of the biotopes CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri and CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, no information was found concerning the effects of heavy metals on encrusting coralline algae or the sensitivity of Caryophyllia smithii or Parasmittina trispinosa to heavy metal contamination. It is well recognised that ascidians are capable of accumulating trace elements such as heavy metals, but no information is available regarding the effects of this accumulation (Jackson, 2008).

Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

Echinoderms tend to be very sensitive to various types of marine pollution (Newton & McKenzie, 1995). Adult Ophiothrix fragilis have been documented to be intolerant to hydrocarbons (Newton & McKenzie, 1995). The sub-cuticular bacteria that are symbiotic with Ophiothrix fragilis are reduced in number following exposure to hydrocarbons. Exposure to 30,000 ppm oil reduces the bacterial load by 50% and brittlestars begin to die (Newton & McKenzie, 1995). The water-accumulated fraction of diesel oil has been found to be acutely toxic to Ophiothrix fragilis and Ophiocomina nigra, although no field observations of beds being damaged by hydrocarbon pollution have been found (Hughes, 1998b).

Untreated oil (e.g. from oil spills) is not a risk, since it is concentrated mainly at the surface, and circalittoral biotopes are likely to be protected by their depth. If oil is treated by dispersant, the resulting emulsion will penetrate down the water column, especially under the influence of turbulence (Hartnoll, 1998).

Synthetic compound contamination

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed but evidence is presented where available.

Echinoderms tend to be very sensitive to various types of marine pollution (Newton & McKenzie, 1995) but there is no more detailed information than this broad statement. In laboratory experiments Smith (1968) found the concentration of BP1002 (the detergent used in the Torrey Canyon oil spill clean-up) needed to kill the majority of Ophiocomina nigra was 5 ppm. Although there are no known examples of brittlestar beds being damaged by chemical pollutants such as pesticides or anti-parasite chemicals used in aquaculture, it is logical to suppose they would be adversely affected.

Regarding the remaining characterizing species of the biotopes CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri and CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, no information could be found relating to the sensitivity of Caryophyllia smithii, Parasmittina trispinosa, Ciona intestinalis or Ascidia mentula to synthetic compound contamination. Chamberlain (1996) observed that although Lithophyllum incrustans was quickly affected by oil during the Sea Empress spill, recovery occurred within about a year. The oil was found to have destroyed about one third of the thallus thickness but regeneration occurred from thallus filaments below the damaged area.

Radionuclide contamination

Benchmark. An increase in 10µGy/h above background levels. Further detail

Evidence

Adult echinoderms such as Ophiothrix fragilis are known to be efficient concentrators of radionuclides (Hutchins et al., 1996). However, there was no information available about the effect of this bioaccumulation.

Introduction of other substances

Benchmark. Exposure of marine species or habitat to one or more relevant contaminants via uncontrolled releases or incidental spills. Further detail

Evidence

This pressure is Not assessed.

De-oxygenation

Benchmark. Exposure to dissolved oxygen concentration of less than or equal to 2 mg/l for one week (a change from WFD poor status to bad status). Further detail

Evidence

Cole et al. (1999) suggested possible adverse effects on marine species exposed to dissolved oxygen concentrations below 4 mg/l and probable adverse effects below 2mg/l. However, Ophiothrix fragilis is known to have a low respiration rate (Migné & Davoult, 1997b), and experiments by Rosenberg et al. (1991, cited in Diaz & Rosenberg, 1995) suggested that the higher tolerance to hypoxia shown by Amphiura chiajei compared to Amphiura filiformis could also be linked to lower respirations rates, although both these brittlestars species were considered to be resistant to moderate hypoxia (Diaz & Rosenberg, 1995, references therein).

Stachowitsch (1984) observed a mass mortality of benthic organisms in the Gulf of Trieste, northern Adriatic Sea, caused by the onset of severe hypoxia (oxygen depletion) in the near-bottom water. A wide variety of organisms were affected, including burrowing invertebrates, sponges, and the brittlestar Ophiothrix quinquemaculata, a dominant component of the local epifaunal community. This event was likely caused by a combination of unfavourable weather and tidal conditions, at the same time as a period of maximal organic input from coastal pollution and dying phytoplankton. Water exchange in the Gulf was poor, and the area tended to accumulate sediment and suspended organic material. Very high productivity in the water column, combined with sewage input throughout the summer tourist season, probably led to the consumption of most of the dissolved oxygen by microbial activity. Mortality occurred when the oxygen-deficient water mass extended to the sea floor (Stachowitsch, 1984).

Sensitivity assessment: The evidence presented suggests that some species of brittlestar are likely to tolerate moderate levels of hypoxia. However, Stachowitsch (1984) observed a mass mortality of brittlestar Ophiothrix quinquemaculata within 2-3 days of the onset of a hypoxia event. Resistance of the biotopes are assessed as ‘Medium’ and recovery assessed as ‘High’ resulting in the sensitive of the biotopes being considered ‘Low’ at the pressure benchmark.

Nutrient enrichment

Benchmark. Compliance with WFD criteria for good status. Further detail

Evidence

It is thought that dense Ophiothrix beds may play an important role in local nutrient cycles by filtration and concentration of suspended particulate matter and by excretion of nitrogenous waste (Hughes, 1998b). Brittlestar beds are therefore likely to be able to resiste increased nutrient levels in the form of dissolved nutrients or particulate matter. For example, in the Bay of Brest in Brittany, Hily (1991) estimated that Ophiothrix beds with over 400 individuals/m² could filter the equivalent of 30% of the total water volume of the bay daily. The inflow of nutrient-rich stream water into the bay led to very high primary productivity, but eutrophication did not occur, because of the removal of particulate matter by the benthic community of brittlestars. A dense aggregation of Ophiothrix and Ophiocomina appeared to be unaffected by the presence of a salmon farm within 100 m (B. Ball pers. comm. in Hughes, 1998b). Since such farms often result in an increase in nutrients to the sea bed, brittlestar beds appear to be able to resiste some increase in nutrient levels (Hughes, 1998b). Raymont (1950) recorded an increase in populations of Ophiocomina nigra following the addition of fertilizers to the waters of an enclosed basin of Loch Sween, Argyll.

Atalah & Crowe (2010) added nutrients to rockpools in controlled experiments. The rockpools were occupied by a range of algae including encrusting corallines, and also grazers. Their results showed that the cover of coralline crusts was adversely affected by a reduction of nutrients, but only when grazers were removed from the treatments. Although the experimental treatments do not directly relate to the pressure benchmark, they indicate some general trends in sensitivity. Given that grazers are not significant structuring species of these biotopes, and the densities of brittlestars are unlikely to be affected by this pressure, coralline crusts are also unlikely to be affected by this pressure. Caryophyllia smithii and Parasmittina trispinosa are suspension feeders of phytoplankton and zooplankton. Nutrient enrichment of coastal waters that enhances the population of phytoplankton may be beneficial to Caryophyllia smithii and Parasmittina trispinosa in terms of an increased food supply, although Hartnoll (1998) found that effects were uncertain for species such as Alcyonium digitatum, Caryophyllia smithii and Spirobranchus triqueter. The survival of Caryophyllia smithii and Parasmittina trispinosa may be influenced indirectly. High primary productivity in the water column combined with high summer temperature and the development of thermal stratification (which prevents mixing of the water column) can lead to hypoxia of the bottom waters which faunal species are likely to be sensitive to (see de-oxygenation pressure). Coralline crusts, Caryophyllia smithii and Parasmittina trispinosa are characterizing species of the biotope CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri.

Regarding the characterizing species of the biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, there is some suggestion that there are possible benefits to ascidians from increased nutrient content of water (Naranjo et al., 1996). Ascidia mentula has been reported in Iberian bays subject to both nutrient-rich upwelling events and anthropogenic pollution (Aneiros, 2015)

Sensitivity assessment. Due to the resistance of high levels of nutrient input demonstrated by species of brittlestars, brittlestar beds may be able to resiste nutrient enrichment. Resistance is assessed as 'High' and resilience as 'High' (by default) and the biotopes are considered as ‘Not Sensitive’ at the pressure benchmark that assumes compliance with good status as defined by the WFD.

Organic enrichment

Benchmark. A deposit of 100 gC/m²/yr. Further detail

Evidence

Organic enrichment may be beneficial to suspension feeders as a direct source of food and may indirectly enhance food supply where enrichment stimulates local growth of phytoplankton and diatoms. Raymont (1950) recorded an increase in Ophiocomina nigra populations following the addition of fertilizers to the waters of an enclosed basin of Loch Sween, Argyll. A dense aggregation of Ophiothrix and Ophiocomina was recorded in 1974 from a site at the mouth of Killary Harbour, western Ireland, and reported unchanged following subsequent establishment of a salmon farm within 100 m of the main beds (B. Ball, pers. comm. cited in Hughes, 1998b). However, high levels of organic enrichment would be expected to result in excessive sedimentation and hypoxia having deleterious effects on brittlestars and other suspension feeders. Stachowitsch (1984) reported that organic pollution may well have contributed to the environmental oxygen depletion causing mass mortality of brittlestar Ophiothrix quinquemaculata in the Gulf of Trieste.

The AZTI Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) is a biotic index to assess disturbance (including organic enrichment). Borja et al. (2000) assigned Ophiothrix fragilis to Ecological Group I (Species very sensitive to organic enrichment and present under unpolluted conditions (initial state) whereas Gittenberger & Van Loon (2011) assigned this species to Ecological Group II (Species indifferent to enrichment, always present in low densities with non-significant variations with time) (from initial state, to slight unbalance). Ophiocomina nigra has not been assigned an AMBI category. Although the unpublished Gittenberger & Van Loon (2011) report is an update on Borja et al. (2000), the former is a peer reviewed publication. Given that the evidence used in both cases is unclear, the degree of confidence is assessed as medium.

Caryophyllia smithii and Parasmittina trispinosa, that occur in biotope CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri, are suspension feeders of phytoplankton and zooplankton. Organic enrichment of coastal waters that enhances the population of phytoplankton may be beneficial to Caryophyllia smithii and Parasmittina trispinosa in terms of an increased food supply, so the survival of Caryophyllia smithii and Parasmittina trispinosa may be influenced indirectly. High primary productivity in the water column combined with high summer temperature and the development of thermal stratification (which prevents mixing of the water column) can lead to hypoxia of the bottom waters which faunal species are likely to be sensitive to (see de-oxygenation pressure).

Regarding the characterizing species of the biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, there is some suggestion that there are possible benefits to ascidians from increased organic content of water (Naranjo et al., 1996). Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula have been reported in locations enriched by organic pollutants (Carver et al., 2006; Aneiros, 2015).

Sensitivity assessment: The evidence presented based on the AMBI scores conflicts and considered with caution. These biotopes are generally found in areas with some water movement and this is likely to disperse organic matter reducing organic material load. Resistance to organic enrichment is assessed as ‘High’ and resilience as ‘High’. These biotopes are therefore assessed as ‘Not Sensitive’ to organic enrichment, and the animals found within the biotopes may be able to utilize the input of organic matter as food, or are likely to be resistant of inputs at the benchmark level.

Physical loss (to land or freshwater habitat)

Benchmark. A permanent loss of existing saline habitat within the site. Further detail

Evidence

All marine habitats and benthic species are considered to have a resistance of ‘None’ to this pressure and to be unable to recover from a permanent loss of habitat (resilience is ‘Very Low’). Sensitivity within the direct spatial footprint of this pressure is therefore ‘High’. Although no specific evidence is described confidence in this assessment is high, due to the incontrovertible nature of this pressure. 

Physical change (to another seabed type)

Benchmark. Permanent change from sedimentary or soft rock substrata to hard rock or artificial substrata or vice-versa. Further detail

Evidence

If rock were replaced with sediment, this would represent a fundamental change to the physical character of the biotopes and the species would be unlikely to recover. The biotopes would be lost.

Sensitivity assessment: Resistance to the pressure is considered ‘None’, and resilience ‘Very low’. Sensitivity has been assessed as ‘High’.

Physical change (to another sediment type)

Benchmark. Permanent change in one Folk class (based on UK SeaMap simplified classification). Further detail

Evidence

'Not Relevant' for biotopes that occur on bedrock. 

Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction)

Benchmark. The extraction of substratum to 30 cm (where substratum includes sediments and soft rock but excludes hard bedrock). Further detail

Evidence

Brittlestar beds occur on rocky substrata. The AmenCio.Bri biotope includes mixed substrata (including gavel) but on rock, as no infauna are recorded (Connor et al., 2004). Therefore this pressure is ‘Not Relevant’. 

Abrasion / disturbance of the surface of the substratum or seabed

Benchmark. Damage to surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat). Further detail

Evidence

Brittlestars are epifaunal and have fragile arms so are likely to be directly exposed and damaged by abrasion. Brittlestars can tolerate considerable damage to arms and even the disk without suffering mortality and are capable of arm and even some disk regeneration (Sköld, 1998). Fishermen tend to avoid brittlestar beds since the animals clog their nets (Jones et al., 2000). However, a passing scallop dredge is likely to remove, displace, or damage brittlestars caught in its path. Although several species of brittlestar were reported to increase in abundance in trawled areas (including Ophiocomina nigra), Bradshaw et al. (2002) noted that the relatively sessile Ophiothrix fragilis decreased in the long-term in areas subject to scallop dredging. Overall, a proportion of the population is likely to be damaged or removed. An average of 36% of individuals in five British brittlestar beds were regenerating arms (Aronson, 1989) which suggests that the beds could persist following exposure to a pressure.

A study by Boulcott & Howell (2011) on the effects of scallop dredging in rocky substrata suggested that associated epifaunal communities, such as bryozoans, hydroids, soft corals and sponges are removed by a passing scallop dredge and that damage to these communities is incremental. The study also recorded that mobile substrata present is likely to be moved and turned as a result of the passing dredge, leading to further damage to the epifaunal communities. The cumulative impacts of mobile substrata are likely to have a great significance for the CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri biotope, which is characterized by occurring on mixed substrata.

Encrusting and colonial organisms such as coralline crusts, sponges and bryozoans (including Parasmittina trispinosa),  that occur in CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri, may have good regenerative abilities. Veale et al. (2000) reported that the abundance, biomass and production of epifaunal assemblages decreased with increasing fishing effort. Both Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula, found in CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, are large, emergent, sessile ascidians, and physical disturbance is likely to cause damage with mortality likely. However, Ascidia spp. have been shown to become more abundant following disturbance events (Bradshaw et al., 2000); likely as a result of the rapid recruitment of these species.

Sensitivity assessment. Epifaunal species and communities are considered to be amongst the most vulnerable to bottom gears (Jennings & Kaiser, 1998) and the impact of surface abrasion will depend on the footprint, duration and magnitude of the pressure. Based on the evidence, resistance to a single abrasion event is assessed as ‘Low’ and resilience as ‘Medium’, so that sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’. Resistance and resilience will be lower (and hence sensitivity greater) to repeated abrasion events.

Penetration or disturbance of the substratum subsurface

Benchmark. Damage to sub-surface features (e.g. species and physical structures within the habitat). Further detail

Evidence

The species characterizing these biotopes are epifaunal occurring on rock which is resistant to sub-surface penetration. The assessment for abrasion at the surface only is therefore considered to equally represent sensitivity to this pressure. 'Not Relevant'.

Changes in suspended solids (water clarity)

Benchmark. A change in one rank on the WFD (Water Framework Directive) scale e.g. from clear to intermediate for one year. Further detail

Evidence

Circalittoral rock habitats are characterized by animal dominated communities (Connor et al., 2004). Ophiothrix fragilis, Ophiocomina nigra and Ophiura albida are passive suspension feeders and a significant supply of suspended organic material is needed to meet the energetic costs of the great numbers of individuals in a brittlestar bed. Brittlestar beds occur in a variety of water flow regimes from sea lochs to more energetic coastal sites (Connor et al., 2004) so are likely to tolerate a variety of different suspended sediment concentrations. For example, dense britlestar beds occur in the Dover Straits, where the concentration of suspended particles in the water column changes between 18-32 mg/l annually (Davoult & Gounin, 1995). Although some brittlestar species are able to perceive differences in light and dark, visual perception is limited (Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014) and brittlestars are unlikely to be directly affected by changes in light resulting from a change in turbidity and suspended solids.

However, local increases in turbidity in waters previously within the photic zone, may alter local abundances of phytoplankton and surface diatoms and the zooplankton and other small invertebrates that feed on them. Davoult & Gounin (1995) found that the growth rate of Ophiothrix in the Dover Strait was maximal in April/May, coinciding with the spring phytoplankton bloom, which suggests that an increase in suspended solids and resulting increase in turbidity may indirectly reduce feeding efficiency in brittlestars. Nonetheless, since phytoplankton may arrive from distant sources and brittlestars may also feed on organic detritus any effects are expected to be small. Additionally, Ophiothrix fragilis has a low respiration rate and can tolerate considerable loss of body mass during reproductive periods (Davoult et al., 1990) suggesting that this species may tolerate feeding restrictions.

Other species occurring in the biotopes CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri and CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, such as hydroids, bryozoans, Parasmittina trispinosa and Caryophillya smithii, and Ascidia mentula and Ciona intestinalis, respectively, are suspension feeders and may benefit from an increase in suspended organic matter. Corals such as Caryophillya smithii have cilia on their tentacles capable of clearing silt (K. Hiscock, pers. obs.; cited in Hiscock, 2000) and Hiscock and Howlett (1976) found higher densities of Caryophyllia smithii in turbid waters which limited the growth of kelps. CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri often has a silty appearance (Connor et al., 2004), so Ascidia mentula and Ciona intestinalis are likely to be tolerant of an increase in suspended sediment and may have adapted mechanisms to prevent blocking of feeding apertures (Naranjo et al., 1996).

Coralline algae, especially the crustose forms that are relevant for biotope CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri, are thought to be resistant of sediment scour (Littler & Kauker, 1984), so any resulting sediment scour resulting from an increase in suspended sediments will probably not adversely affect the coralline crusts at the benchmark level. A change in light resulting from a turbidity change is also unlikely to negatively affect coralline crusts as these are often found in areas with reduced light penetration (Dethier, 1994).

Sensitivity Assessment: The evidence presented suggests that an increase in suspended organic matter may be beneficial by providing increased food material while a decrease in suspended sediment may reduce food supplies to brittlestar beds. Additionally, increases in suspended solids that involve increase of inorganic particles may interfere with the feeding of brittlestars (Aronson, 1992 cited in Hughes, 1998b), particularly in non-current swept areas. However, the biotopes occur in a wide range of conditions and are likely to be adapted to respond to changes in suspended solids at the pressure benchmark and the overall species richness in the biotopes is not likely to change. Resistance is therefore assessed as ‘High’ and resilience as ‘High’, so the biotope is assessed as ‘Not Sensitive’ to a change in turbidity at the pressure benchmark. 

Smothering and siltation rate changes (light)

Benchmark. ‘Light’ deposition of up to 5 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event. Further detail

Evidence

Increased siltation on rock biotopes is likely to lead to a decrease in diversity. Material in suspension can affect the efficiency of filter and suspension feeding (Sherk & Cronin, 1970; Morton, 1976). Effects can include abrasion and clogging of gills, impaired respiration, clogging of filter mechanisms, and reduced feeding and pumping rates. Dense beds of brittlestars tend not to persist in areas of excessive sedimentation, because high levels of sediment foul the brittlestars feeding apparatus (tube feet and arm spines), and ultimately suffocates them (Schäfer, 1962 cited in Aronson, 1992). Aronson (1989) referred to the demise of Warner's (1971) Ophiothrix bed in Torbay, and tentatively suggested it was due to increased sedimentation caused by the localised dumping of construction materials (Aronson, 1989).

Species such as the soft coral Alcyonium digitatum that project above the substratum may not be completely covered with sediment but feeding structures may become clogged. Smaller colonies may be smothered, impairing respiration, and hence adversely affected. Encrusting species (e.g encrusting sponges, and bryozoans such as Parasmittina trispinosa) are more likely to be completely covered and will probably die (Jackson & Hiscock, 2008). However encrusting corallines and encrusting bryozoans have been reported to survive being overgrown by other species (Gordon, 1972; Sebens, 1985; Todd &Turner, 1988; cited in Tyler-Walters, 2002). The solitary ascidians Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula are also attached, but frequently inhabit vertical surfaces (Jackson, 2008), so smothering with 5 cm of sediment is likely to only affect a small proportion of the population.

Caryophyllia smithii is small and sessile and would therefore likely be unable to avoid being inundated in a ‘light’ sedimentation event. Although, Bell & Turner (2000) reported Caryophyllia smithii was abundant at sites of ‘moderate’ sedimentation (7mm ± 0.5mm) in Lough Hyne, a light deposition of 5 cm of sediment is likely to adversely affect this cup coral.

In areas of high water flow dispersion of fine sediments may be rapid and this could mitigate the magnitude of this pressure by reducing the time exposed. This would likely be the case in the medium energy biotopes CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri and CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr.Bri, where ‘light’ deposition of sediments is likely to be cleared in a few tidal cycles. On the other hand, in the low energy biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, deposited sediment is likely to persist for a longer period, resulting in aggravated impacts on the biotopes’ communities.

In exposed situations suspended material can cause scour, but this is normally a result of the temporary resuspension of relatively coarse bottom material rather than of fine material in long-term suspension.

Sensitivity assessment. This pressure is not considered to alter the physical reef habitat but there may be effects on the biological community. Habitat resistance is assessed as ‘Low’ given that the key characterizing species of brittlestars are likely to be affected by a single discrete event of light deposition of fine materials that is not removed in the short-term by water movement. Resilience is likely to be ‘Medium’ and the habitat sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’.

Smothering and siltation rate changes (heavy)

Benchmark. ‘Heavy’ deposition of up to 30 cm of fine material added to the seabed in a single discrete event. Further detail

Evidence

Overall, the effect of increased siltation on rock biotopes is likely to lead to a decrease in diversity. Material in suspension can affect the efficiency of filter feeding (Sherk & Cronin, 1970; Morton, 1976). Effects can include abrasion and clogging of gills, impaired respiration, clogging of filter mechanisms, and reduced feeding and pumping rates. Dense beds of brittlestars tend not to persist in areas of excessive sedimentation, because high levels of sediment foul the brittlestars feeding apparatus (tube feet and arm spines), and ultimately suffocates them (Schäfer, 1962 cited in Aronson, 1992). Aronson (1989) referred to the demise of Warner's (1971) Ophiothrix bed in Torbay, and tentatively suggested it was due to increased sedimentation caused by the localised dumping of construction materials (Aronson, 1989).

Species such as the soft coral Alcyonium digitatum that project above the substratum may not be completely covered with sediment but feeding structures may become clogged. Smaller colonies may be smothered, impairing respiration, and hence adversely affected.

Other more low lying or encrusting species (encrusting sponges, and bryozoans such as Parasmittina trispinosa are more likely to be completely covered and will probably die (Jackson & Hiscock, 2008). However encrusting corallines and encrusting bryozoans have been reported to survive being overgrown by other species (Gordon, 1972; Sebens, 1985; Todd & Turner, 1988 cited in Tyler-Walters, 2002). The solitary ascidians Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula are also attached to isolated rocks and boulders, so the heights at which they occur may result in not all the population being affected by smothering with 30 cm of sediment.

Caryophyllia smithii is small and sessile and would therefore likely be unable to avoid and be inundated in a ‘heavy’ sedimentation event. Although, Bell & Turner (2000) reported Caryophyllia smithii was abundant at sites of ‘moderate’ sedimentation (7mm ± 0.5mm) in Lough Hyne, a heavy deposition of 30 cm of sediment is likely to adversely affect this cup coral.

In areas of high water flow dispersion of fine sediments may be rapid and this could mitigate the magnitude of this pressure by reducing the time exposed. This would likely be the case in the medium energy biotopes CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri and CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr.Bri, where ‘heavy’ deposition of sediments is likely to be cleared in several tidal cycles. On the other hand, in the low energy biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, deposited sediment is likely to persist for a longer period, resulting in aggravated impacts on the biotopes’ communities.

In exposed situations suspended material can cause scour, but this is normally a result of the temporary re-suspension of relatively coarse bottom material rather than of fine material in long-term suspension.

Sensitivity assessment. This pressure is not considered to alter the physical reef habitat but there may be effects on the biological community. The brittlestars forming the dense beds characterizing these biotopes are likely to be adversely affected by the smothering effect of a ‘heavy’ deposition of 30 cm of sediment in a single discrete event. Other small suspension feeders, encrusting species and cup-corals may also be smothered resulting in a decrease in species diversity, depending on the time taken for the deposited sediment to be removed by water flow. Habitat resistance is assessed as ‘Low’ for CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri and CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr.Bri, and ‘None’ for CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, based on how quickly the sediment deposited would be removed by water movement. Recovery is probably ‘Medium’ and the habitats sensitivity is assessed as ‘Medium’.

Litter

Benchmark. The introduction of man-made objects able to cause physical harm (surface, water column, seafloor or strandline). Further detail

Evidence

Not assessed.

Electromagnetic changes

Benchmark. A local electric field of 1 V/m or a local magnetic field of 10 µT. Further detail

Evidence

‘No Evidence’ is available on which to assess this pressure. 

Underwater noise changes

Benchmark. MSFD indicator levels (SEL or peak SPL) exceeded for 20% of days in a calendar year. Further detail

Evidence

There is little known about the effects of underwater sound on marine invertebrates. Although there are no records of brittlestars reacting to noise, sound vibrations may trigger some response. However, at the level of the benchmark the biotopes are not likely to be sensitive to noise pollution. For example, brittlestar beds have been recorded from Kinsale Harbour (Hughes, 1998b) on the south coast of Ireland where there is likely to be noise disturbance from passing boat traffic.

Sensitivity assessment: There is not enough evidence to assess this pressure. 

Introduction of light or shading

Benchmark. A change in incident light via anthropogenic means. Further detail

Evidence

CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri, CR.MCR.EcCr.FaAlCr.Bri and CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri are circalittoral biotopes (Connor et al., 2004) and therefore, not directly dependent on sunlight. Although some brittlestar species are able to perceive differences in light and dark, visual perception is limited (Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014) and this suggests that the brittlestars are unlikely to be directly affected by change in light.

Sensitivity assessment. The biotopes are considered to have ‘High’ resistance and, by default, ‘High’ resilience and therefore is ‘Not Sensitive’ to this pressure.

Barrier to species movement

Benchmark. A permanent or temporary barrier to species movement over ≥50% of water body width or a 10% change in tidal excursion. Further detail

Evidence

‘Not Relevant’ to biotopes restricted to open waters.

Death or injury by collision

Benchmark. Injury or mortality from collisions of biota with both static or moving structures due to 0.1% of tidal volume on an average tide, passing through an artificial structure. Further detail

Evidence

‘Not Relevant’ to seabed habitats.

Visual disturbance

Benchmark. The daily duration of transient visual cues exceeds 10% of the period of site occupancy by the feature. Further detail

Evidence

Ophiothrix fragilis and other brittlestars and starfish are likely to have poor facility for visual perception and consequently are probably not sensitive to visual disturbance. Movement of a hand near to Ophiothrix fragilis, for example, elicits no escape response (Sköld, 1998). Although some other species, such as crabs and fish, may respond to visual disturbance such behaviour is not likely to have an impact on the nature and function of a brittlestar bed so the biotopes are expected to be not sensitive to the factor. Therefore, this pressure is considered 'Not Relevant'.

Genetic modification & translocation of indigenous species

Benchmark. Translocation of indigenous species or the introduction of genetically modified or genetically different populations of indigenous species that may result in changes in the genetic structure of local populations, hybridization, or change in community structure. Further detail

Evidence

The key characterizing species in these biotopes are not cultivated or likely to be translocated. This pressure is therefore considered ‘Not Relevant’. 

Introduction or spread of invasive non-indigenous species

Benchmark. The introduction of one or more invasive non-indigenous species (INIS). Further detail

Evidence

Crepidula fornicata larvae require hard substrata for settlement. It prefers muddy gravelly, shell-rich, substrata that include gravel, or shells of other Crepidula, or other species e.g., oysters, and mussels. It is highly gregarious and seeks out adult shells for settlement, forming characteristic ‘stacks’ of adults. But it also recorded from rock, artificial substrata, and Sabellaria alveolata reefs (Blanchard, 1997, 2009; Bohn et al., 2012, 2013a, 2013b, 2015; De Montaudouin et al., 2018; Hinz et al., 2011; Helmer et al., 2019; Powell-Jennings & Calloway, 2018; Preston et al., 2020; Tillin et al., 2020). Close examination of the literature (2023) shows that evidence of its colonization and density on bedrock in the infralittoral or circalittoral was lacking. Tillin et al. (2020) suggested that Crepidula could colonize circalittoral rock due to its presence on tide-swept rough grounds in the English Channel (Hinz et al., 2011). However, Hinz et al. (2011) reported that Crepidula fornicata only dominated one assemblage (with an average of 181 individuals per trawl) on gravel substratum with boulders. Bohn et al. (2015) noted that Crepidula occurred at low density or was absent in areas dominated by boulders, and Bohn et al. (2013a, 2013b, 2015) and Preston et al. (2020) showed that while Crepidula could settle on slate panels or ‘stone’ it preferred shell, especially that of conspecifics. In addition, no evidence was found of the effect of Crepidula populations on faunal turf-dominated habitats. It was only recorded at low density (0.1-0.9/m²) in one faunal turf biotope (CR.MCR.CFaVS.CuSpH.As) (JNCC, 2015). Faunal turfs are dominated by suspension feeders so larval predation is probably high, which may prevent colonization by Crepidula. Also, faunal turf species actively compete for space and many are fast growing and opportunistic, so may out-compete Crepidula for space even if it gained a foothold in the community. 

For biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio. Bri, Styela clava was first recorded in the UK at Plymouth in 1952 (Eno et al., 1997), and where Styela clava and Ciona intestinalis co-occur they may compete for space and food.

Sensitivity assessment. The circalittoral rock characterizing this biotope is likely to be unsuitable for the colonization by Crepidula fornicata due to the wave exposed conditions (exposed to moderately exposed), in which wave action and storms may mitigate or prevent the colonization by Crepidula at high densities, although Crepidula has been recorded from areas of strong tidal streams (Hinz et al., 2011). The presence of mixed substrata, including gravel and cobble (JNCC, 2015), in some examples of the biotope, could provide suitable hard substrata for the colonization by Crepidula however, there is no evidence to suggest Crepidula would establish. Crepidula has been recorded from the lower intertidal to ca 160 m in depth but is most common in the shallow subtidal above 50 m (Blanchard, 1997; Thieltges et al., 2003; Bohn et al., 2012, 2015; Hinz et al., 2011; OBIS, 2023; Tillin et al., 2020), therefore, colonization of Crepidula would be limited to low densities in deeper examples of the biotope. In addition, no evidence was found of the effect of Crepidula populations on faunal turf-dominated habitats or infralittoral or circalittoral rock habitats. The main characterizing feature of the biotope (the brittlestars) would be likely to remain unaltered, there is no evidence of how the brittlestars would compete with Crepidula. At present, there is 'Insufficient evidence' to suggest that the circalittoral rock biotopes are sensitive to colonization by Crepidula fornicata or other invasive species; further evidence is required. 

Introduction of microbial pathogens

Benchmark. The introduction of relevant microbial pathogens or metazoan disease vectors to an area where they are currently not present (e.g. Martelia refringens and Bonamia, Avian influenza virus, viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia virus). Further detail

Evidence

Introduced organisms (especially parasites or pathogens) are a potential threat in all coastal ecosystems. So far, brittlestar beds have not been affected. Dense aggregations of brittlestars would offer ideal conditions for the rapid spread of pathogenic organisms or parasites, but so far no examples of this have been recorded. However, several examples are known of echinoderm populations that have been massively reduced by sudden outbreaks of epidemic disease. Cases include the mass mortality of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum throughout the Caribbean as a result of infection by a water-borne pathogen (Lessios, 1988), and the decimation of urchin populations in the North Atlantic by parasitic amoebae and nematodes (Hagen, 1997). Epidemic disease should therefore be considered as having the potential to significantly affect populations of bed-forming brittlestars (Hughes, 1998b), as even widespread and abundant species can be vulnerable.

Lynch et al. (2007) investigated the possible role of benthic macroinvertebrates and zooplankton in the life cycle of Bonamia ostrea, a parasite the European flat oyster Ostrea edulis. Their laboratory studies found that the brittlestar Ophiothrix fragilis was a passive carrier of the parasite but is not infected. Brittlestar mortality in their treatments was not explained, and it was uncertain if parasite infection was to blame. However, they found where the oysters co-habited with the brittlestars, oyster infection by the parasite was lower. It is, however, unlikely that the oyster-specific parasite would be responsible for the brittlestar mortalities recorded (Lynch et al., 2007).

The parasite Lankesteria ascidiae is the only pathogen targeting any of the characterizing species in these biotopes, attacking the digestive tubes and causing ‘long faeces syndrome’ in Ciona intestinalis (although it has also been recorded in other species), and is therefore relevant for biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri. Mortality occurs in severely affected individuals within about a week following first symptoms (Mita et al., 2012).

Sensitivity assessment.The evidence suggests that brittlestars may be exposed to pathogens, but that no mortality has been reported. Therefore brittlestar beds probably have ‘High’ resistance to this pressure. By default resilience is assessed as ‘High’ and the biotopes are classed as ‘Not sensitive’. 

Removal of target species

Benchmark. Removal of species targeted by fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale. Further detail

Evidence

Brittlestar beds are currently not targeted by commercial fisheries and hence not directly affected by this pressure (Tillin & Tyler-Walters, 2014). This pressure is therefore considered ‘Not Relevant’.

Removal of non-target species

Benchmark. Removal of features or incidental non-targeted catch (by-catch) through targeted fishery, shellfishery or harvesting at a commercial or recreational scale. Further detail

Evidence

Fisheries tend to avoid brittlestar beds since the animals clog nets (Jones et al., 2000). However, brittlestars may be damaged or directly removed by static or mobile gears that are targeting other species. Direct, physical removal is assessed under abrasion and penetration pressures. The sensitivity assessment for this pressure considers any biological and ecological effects resulting from the removal of non-target species.

Although several species of brittlestar (including Ophiocomina nigra) were reported to have increased in abundance in trawled areas, Bradshaw et al. (2002) noted that the relatively sessile Ophiothrix fragilis decreased in the long-term in areas subject to scallop dredging. The bed may contract in size as individual brittlestars move to re-establish contact with neighbours or the number of low density patches could increase. If water currents were very strong some animals may be washed away as the support provided by other individuals in dense aggregations decreases. In addition, commercial fisheries may discard damaged or dead non-target species. This could result in increased available food supply to scavenging brittlestars but may also attract mobile predators and scavengers including fish and crustaceans to habitats supporting brittlestars, which may alter predation rates.

The remaining defining species in these biotopes, including the coralline crusts, Caryophyllia smithii and Parasmittina trispinosa for biotope CR.MCR.EcCr.CarSp.Bri, and Ciona intestinalis and Ascidia mentula for biotope CR.LCR.BrAs.AmenCio.Bri, are sessile and also likely to be incidentally removed as part of an extraction or fishing event.

Sensitivity assessment: Once extraction or fishing has stopped, brittlestars that remain in the bed are likely to be able to re-establish the density observed prior to the event. Based on the evidence presented, the resistance of these biotopes is considered to be ‘Low’, with ‘Medium’ resilience and therefore the biotopes are considered to have ‘Medium’ sensitivity to this pressure.