Distribution data supplied by the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS). To interrogate UK data visit the NBN Atlas.Map Help
Researched by | Nicola White | Refereed by | Dr Dagmar Stengel |
Authority | (Linnaeus) Decaisne & Thuret, 1845 | ||
Other common names | - | Synonyms | - |
A common brown seaweed found high on the shore. It is very tolerant of desiccation surviving up to 8 days out of the water. Pelvetia canaliculata lives for about 4 years and grows up to 15 cm long. The fronds of the algae are curled longitudinally forming a channel.
Pelvetia canaliculata has an obligate endophytic fungus Mycosphaerella acophylli (Ascomycetes).
- none -
Phylum | Ochrophyta | Brown and yellow-green seaweeds |
Class | Phaeophyceae | |
Order | Fucales | |
Family | Fucaceae | |
Genus | Pelvetia | |
Authority | (Linnaeus) Decaisne & Thuret, 1845 | |
Recent Synonyms |
Typical abundance | High density | ||
Male size range | Up to 15cm | ||
Male size at maturity | 4cm | ||
Female size range | 4cm | ||
Female size at maturity | |||
Growth form | Shrub | ||
Growth rate | 3-4cm/year | ||
Body flexibility | |||
Mobility | |||
Characteristic feeding method | Autotroph | ||
Diet/food source | |||
Typically feeds on | |||
Sociability | |||
Environmental position | Epifloral | ||
Dependency | Independent. | ||
Supports | No information | ||
Is the species harmful? | No |
Pelvetia canaliculata is very tolerant of desiccation. It may spend up to 90 percent of the time out of the water and can tolerate 65 percent water loss. The species can photosynthesise when exposed to air but may suffer nutrient stress as it can only obtain nutrients when submerged. The species supports an impoverished fauna due to the harsh physical conditions on the upper shore. A few species of wandering isopods and amphipods may be found sheltering underneath the fronds at low tide.
Physiographic preferences | Open coast, Strait / sound, Sea loch / Sea lough, Ria / Voe |
Biological zone preferences | Lower littoral fringe |
Substratum / habitat preferences | Bedrock, Cobbles, Large to very large boulders, Small boulders |
Tidal strength preferences | Moderately Strong 1 to 3 knots (0.5-1.5 m/sec.), Strong 3 to 6 knots (1.5-3 m/sec.), Weak < 1 knot (<0.5 m/sec.) |
Wave exposure preferences | Moderately exposed, Sheltered, Very sheltered |
Salinity preferences | Full (30-40 psu), Variable (18-40 psu) |
Depth range | Not relevant |
Other preferences | No text entered |
Migration Pattern | Non-migratory / resident |
Reproductive type | Permanent (synchronous) hermaphrodite | |
Reproductive frequency | Annual episodic | |
Fecundity (number of eggs) | No information | |
Generation time | 1-2 years | |
Age at maturity | 1-2 years | |
Season | August - September | |
Life span | 2-5 years |
Larval/propagule type | - |
Larval/juvenile development | Not relevant |
Duration of larval stage | No information |
Larval dispersal potential | No information |
Larval settlement period | Insufficient information |
The MarLIN sensitivity assessment approach used below has been superseded by the MarESA (Marine Evidence-based Sensitivity Assessment) approach (see menu). The MarLIN approach was used for assessments from 1999-2010. The MarESA approach reflects the recent conservation imperatives and terminology and is used for sensitivity assessments from 2014 onwards.
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence/Confidence | |
High | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Pelvetia canaliculata is permanently attached to the substratum, so would be removed upon substratum loss. Recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
High | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
The effects of smothering depend on the state of the tide when the incident occurred. If smothering took place when the plant was emersed the whole of the plant may be buried under the sediment preventing photosynthesis. If smothering happened while the plant was immersed some of the fronds may escape smothering and be able to continue photosynthesis. Recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
Low | Immediate | Not sensitive | Moderate | |
Silt may settle out on the fronds reducing the light available for photosynthesis and therefore lowering growth rates. Siltation may prevent or certainly reduce recruitment (D. Stengel pers. comm.). Once conditions have returned to normal the growth rate would quickly return to normal. | ||||
No information | ||||
Intermediate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Pelvetia canaliculata is very tolerant of desiccation, it can survive emerged for several days after reduction of its water content to just a few percent (Schonbeck & Norton, 1978). However, it cannot withstand desiccation beyond this and an increase in the normal desiccation levels would result in the death of some plants at the uppermost limit of its range. Thus, the upper limit of the Pelvetia canaliculata population would be depressed and so intolerance has been assessed as intermediate. Decreases in the level of desiccation would result in the species being competitively displaced by faster growing species and Pelvetia canaliculata may colonize further up the shore. Recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
Intermediate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Even on a regular basis, Pelvetia canaliculata can tolerate emersion for up to 8 days. However, those individuals living at the highest level on the shore are living at the top of their physiological tolerance limits and so would not be likely to tolerate an increase in emersion levels. This would result in the upper extent of the species being depressed. Decreases in emersion would result in the species being competitively displaced by faster growing species and Pelvetia canaliculata may colonize further up the shore. The species requires exposure to air to survive, it decays if transplanted further down the shore (Lobban & Harrison, 1997). Thus, because some individuals in the population are likely to be killed intolerance is assessed as intermediate. Recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
No information | ||||
Intermediate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
An increase in water flow rate could cause plants to be torn off the substratum or the substratum with the plants attached may be mobilised. Recruitment may be reduced with an increased in water flow rates. A decrease may result in increased siltation which may also reduce recruitment. Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
No information | ||||
Low | High | Low | Low | |
Pelvetia canaliculata is found in much warmer and much cooler waters than the UK as it is distributed from northern Norway to Spain. It is likely to tolerate a change of 5°C in the short term although it showed some signs of damage during the unusually hot summer of 1983, when the average temperature was 8.3°C higher than normal (Hawkins & Hartnoll, 1985). The effect of such an increase The species is likely to be especially tolerant of a long-term change in temperature of 2°C. | ||||
No information | ||||
Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Moderate | |
An increase in turbidity levels would reduce light levels available for photosynthesis during immersion. However, it has been estimated that Pelvetia canaliculata spends up to 90 percent of its time out of the water (Fish & Fish, 1996) where photosynthesis can still take place whilst the thalli remains wet. Since the algae is able to photosynthesize during the early stages of emersion when the plant is still wet the overall effect of increased turbidity is likely to be minimal. A decrease intolerance has therefore, been recorded as low. | ||||
No information | ||||
High | Moderate | Moderate | Low | |
An increase in wave exposure may cause Pelvetia canaliculata to be torn off the substratum or the substratum with plants attached may be mobilised. It is unlikely that any recruitment will occur in areas of high wave exposure. In such sites Pelvetia canaliculata can only grow in crevices. Recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
No information | ||||
Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Not relevant | |
Seaweeds have no known mechanism for perception of noise. | ||||
Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Not relevant | |
Seaweeds have no known mechanism for visual perception. | ||||
Intermediate | Moderate | Moderate | Low | |
Abrasion may kill germlings and damage the fronds of Pelvetia canaliculata. Fucoids are intolerant of abrasion from human trampling which has been shown to reduce fucoid cover on a shore (Fletcher & Frid, 1996; Holt et al., 1997). Therefore, an intolerance of intermediate has been recorded. Recovery rates may be variable. Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event (Keith Hiscock, pers comm.). Therefore, a recoverability of moderate has been recorded. | ||||
High | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Pelvetia canaliculata is permanently attached to the substratum so once removed it cannot re-form an attachment. Recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. |
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence/Confidence | |
No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
Low | High | Low | Low | |
Fucoids are generally robust in the face of chemical pollution (Holt et al., 1997). However, a 50% reduction in growth took place at copper concentrations of 60-80 micrograms per litre. Stromgren (1977) found the growth of Pelvetia canaliculata is actually enhanced by cadmium at concentrations as high as 1000 micrograms per litre although these experiments were not done under natural conditions and may not be applicable in the field (D. Stengel pers. comm.). The reproductive stages are likely to be the most intolerant. | ||||
High | Moderate | Moderate | Low | |
Pelvetia canaliculata disappeared from heavily oiled shores a couple of months after the Amoco Cadiz oil spill (Floc'h & Diouris, 1980). The intolerance of this species is thought to be due to the long residence time of oil on the algae caused by its position high on the shore. Recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
Intermediate | Moderate | Moderate | Low | |
Pelvetia canaliculata is adapted to living at low nutrient levels because it can only obtain nutrients when immersed, which may be for as little as 10 percent of its time. A decrease in nutrient levels would lower growth rate in the species. An increase in nutrient levels may cause the species to be overgrown by green algae. However, this is unlikely to have a great effect because most of these species, such as Ulva, are strongly seasonal and opportunistic and have only short life-spans. Recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
Low | Very high | Very Low | Low | |
Pelvetia canaliculata must be able to withstand wide variations in salinity because it is usually emerged for long periods of time, during which it will be drenched in freshwater from rain. There is recent evidence (D. Stengel pers. comm.) that although Pelvetia canaliculata can tolerate short-term changes in salinity the physiological balance between the alga and the fungus Mycosphaerella may be disturbed in low-salinity conditions in the long-term. | ||||
No information | ||||
No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant | |
Low oxygen levels are unlikely to affect Pelvetia canaliculata as seaweeds are photoautotrophic and do not need any oxygen for photosynthesis. |
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence/Confidence | |
No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant | |
Insufficient information | ||||
Intermediate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Pelvetia canaliculata can recover quickly from harvesting if plants only greater than 14cm are removed. Otherwise recovery rates may be variable, Subrahmanyan (1960) observed that the species readily recruits to cleared areas of the shore and full recovery of the community takes place within five years. However, in the Shetlands Pelvetia canaliculata did not recolonize shores that had been bulldozed until 7-8 years after the event. | ||||
Not relevant | Not relevant | Not relevant | Not relevant | |
NR |
- no data -
National (GB) importance | - | Global red list (IUCN) category | - |
Native | - | ||
Origin | - | Date Arrived | - |
Fish, J.D. & Fish, S., 1996. A student's guide to the seashore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Floc'h, J. H. & Diouris, M., 1980. Initial effects of Amoco Cadiz oil on intertidal algae. Ambio, 9, 284-286.
Hardy, F.G. & Guiry, M.D., 2003. A check-list and atlas of the seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. London: British Phycological Society
Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G., 1985. Factors determining the upper limits of intertidal canopy-forming algae. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 20, 265-271.
Holt, T.J., Hartnoll, R.G. & Hawkins, S.J., 1997. The sensitivity and vulnerability to man-induced change of selected communities: intertidal brown algal shrubs, Zostera beds and Sabellaria spinulosa reefs. English Nature, Peterborough, English Nature Research Report No. 234.
Schonbeck, M.W. & Norton, T.A., 1978. Factors controlling the upper limits of fucoid algae on the shore. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 31, 303-313.
Subrahmanyan, R., 1960. Ecological studies on the Fucales. Part 1. Pelvetia canaliculata Dene. et Thur. The Journal of the Indian Botanical Society, 39, 614 - 630.
Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre, 2017. BRERC species records recorded over 15 years ago. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/h1ln5p accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-25.
Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre, 2017. BRERC species records within last 15 years. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/vntgox accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-25.
Centre for Environmental Data and Recording, 2018. Ulster Museum Marine Surveys of Northern Ireland Coastal Waters. Occurrence dataset https://www.nmni.com/CEDaR/CEDaR-Centre-for-Environmental-Data-and-Recording.aspx accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-25.
Cofnod – North Wales Environmental Information Service, 2018. Miscellaneous records held on the Cofnod database. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/hcgqsi accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-25.
Environmental Records Information Centre North East, 2018. ERIC NE Combined dataset to 2017. Occurrence dataset: http://www.ericnortheast.org.ukl accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-38
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2014. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/erweal accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2015. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/xtrbvy accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Fife Nature Records Centre, 2018. St Andrews BioBlitz 2016. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/146yiz accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-09-27.
Kent Wildlife Trust, 2018. Kent Wildlife Trust Shoresearch Intertidal Survey 2004 onwards. Occurrence dataset: https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01.
Lancashire Environment Record Network, 2018. LERN Records. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/esxc9a accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2017. Isle of Man wildlife records from 01/01/2000 to 13/02/2017. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/mopwow accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2018. Isle of Man historical wildlife records 1990 to 1994. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/aru16v accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2018. Isle of Man historical wildlife records 1995 to 1999. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/lo2tge accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
National Trust, 2017. National Trust Species Records. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/opc6g1 accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
NBN (National Biodiversity Network) Atlas. Available from: https://www.nbnatlas.org.
OBIS (Ocean Biodiversity Information System), 2023. Global map of species distribution using gridded data. Available from: Ocean Biogeographic Information System. www.iobis.org. Accessed: 2023-03-28
Outer Hebrides Biological Recording, 2018. Non-vascular Plants, Outer Hebrides. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/goidos accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-01.
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 2018. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Herbarium (E). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/ypoair accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre, 2018. SEWBReC Algae and allied species (South East Wales). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/55albd accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre, 2018. Dr Mary Gillham Archive Project. Occurance dataset: http://www.sewbrec.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-02
The Wildlife Information Centre, 2018. TWIC Biodiversity Field Trip Data (1995-present). Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/ljc0ke accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, 2018. Yorkshire Wildlife Trust Shoresearch. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/1nw3ch accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
This review can be cited as:
Last Updated: 29/05/2008