An encrusting bryozoan (Oshurkovia littoralis)
Distribution data supplied by the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS). To interrogate UK data visit the NBN Atlas.Map Help
Researched by | Dr Keith Hiscock | Refereed by | Dr Peter J. Hayward |
Authority | (Hastings, 1944) | ||
Other common names | - | Synonyms | Umbonula littoralis |
Summary
Description
Colonies form large orange crusts that spread irregularly and are often fringed with green.
Recorded distribution in Britain and Ireland
Present all around the British Isles.Global distribution
Present from Bergen, Norway south along the western Atlantic coast to at least the Channel Isles and western Brittany. Not present in the Mediterranean.Habitat
A characteristic species of the sublittoral fringe and underboulder habitats. Occurs on rock and on Laminaria spp. holdfasts and Himanthalia elongata buttons.Depth range
Intertidal to 6 mIdentifying features
- Sheet-like encrusting form orange in colour.
- Zooids 0.6 to 0.8 mm x 0.46 x 0.6 mm, oval to hexagonal bordered by raised lines.
- Aperture of zooid elliptical.
- Frontal wall finely granular with 14-20 large and conspicuous areolae.
Additional information
No text entered
Listed by
- none -
Biology review
Taxonomy
Level | Scientific name | Common name |
---|---|---|
Phylum | Bryozoa | Sea mats, horn wrack & lace corals |
Class | Gymnolaemata | Naked throat bryozoans |
Order | Cheilostomatida | |
Family | Umbonulidae | |
Genus | Oshurkovia | |
Authority | (Hastings, 1944) | |
Recent Synonyms | Umbonula littoralis |
Biology
Parameter | Data | ||
---|---|---|---|
Typical abundance | Moderate density | ||
Male size range | |||
Male size at maturity | |||
Female size range | Very small(<1cm) | ||
Female size at maturity | |||
Growth form | Crustose hard | ||
Growth rate | Data deficient | ||
Body flexibility | |||
Mobility | Sessile, permanent attachment | ||
Characteristic feeding method | Active suspension feeder | ||
Diet/food source | |||
Typically feeds on | Suspended material | ||
Sociability | Colonial | ||
Environmental position | Epifaunal | ||
Dependency | Independent. | ||
Supports | None | ||
Is the species harmful? | No information |
Biology information
Oshurkovia (syn. Umbonula) littoralis is a hermaphrodite. The size range given above is for individual zooids.
Habitat preferences
Parameter | Data |
---|---|
Physiographic preferences | Open coast, Strait or Sound, Ria or Voe, Enclosed coast or Embayment |
Biological zone preferences | Sublittoral fringe, Upper infralittoral |
Substratum / habitat preferences | Bedrock, Cobbles, Large to very large boulders, Small boulders |
Tidal strength preferences | Moderately strong 1 to 3 knots (0.5-1.5 m/sec.), Strong 3 to 6 knots (1.5-3 m/sec.), Very strong > 6 knots (>3 m/sec.), Weak < 1 knot (<0.5 m/sec.) |
Wave exposure preferences | Exposed, Extremely exposed, Moderately exposed, Sheltered, Very exposed |
Salinity preferences | Full (30-40 psu) |
Depth range | Intertidal to 6 m |
Other preferences | None |
Migration Pattern | Non-migratory or resident |
Habitat Information
No text enteredLife history
Adult characteristics
Parameter | Data |
---|---|
Reproductive type | Permanent (synchronous) hermaphrodite |
Reproductive frequency | Annual protracted |
Fecundity (number of eggs) | No information |
Generation time | Insufficient information |
Age at maturity | Insufficient information |
Season | June - November |
Life span | Insufficient information |
Larval characteristics
Parameter | Data |
---|---|
Larval/propagule type | - |
Larval/juvenile development | Lecithotrophic |
Duration of larval stage | No information |
Larval dispersal potential | No information |
Larval settlement period |
Life history information
- The dispersal phase is probably brief and larvae probably do not travel far.
- Embryos were recorded as present in the Plymouth area in June and August (Marine Biological Association, 1957), from October and November on the north-east coast of England (Hastings, 1944) and from September to February in Manx waters (Eggleston, 1969).
Sensitivity review
The MarLIN sensitivity assessment approach used below has been superseded by the MarESA (Marine Evidence-based Sensitivity Assessment) approach (see menu). The MarLIN approach was used for assessments from 1999-2010. The MarESA approach reflects the recent conservation imperatives and terminology and is used for sensitivity assessments from 2014 onwards.
Physical pressures
Use / to open/close text displayed
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence / Confidence | |
Substratum loss [Show more]Substratum lossBenchmark. All of the substratum occupied by the species or biotope under consideration is removed. A single event is assumed for sensitivity assessment. Once the activity or event has stopped (or between regular events) suitable substratum remains or is deposited. Species or community recovery assumes that the substratum within the habitat preferences of the original species or community is present. Further details EvidenceRemoval of substratum will remove the attached species. However, larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | High | High | Moderate | Moderate |
Smothering [Show more]SmotheringBenchmark. All of the population of a species or an area of a biotope is smothered by sediment to a depth of 5 cm above the substratum for one month. Impermeable materials, such as concrete, oil, or tar, are likely to have a greater effect. Further details. EvidenceSmothering by overgrowth of competing encrusting ascidians may not kill Umbonula sp. (see Turner, 1988). Smothering by silt may however have an adverse effect. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Intermediate | High | Low | Moderate |
Increase in suspended sediment [Show more]Increase in suspended sedimentBenchmark. An arbitrary short-term, acute change in background suspended sediment concentration e.g., a change of 100 mg/l for one month. The resultant light attenuation effects are addressed under turbidity, and the effects of rapid settling out of suspended sediment are addressed under smothering. Further details EvidenceUmbonula lives in habitats that are generally clear of silt (exposed coasts and downward facing surfaces) but is likely to have at least limited ability to clear silt. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Decrease in suspended sediment [Show more]Decrease in suspended sedimentBenchmark. An arbitrary short-term, acute change in background suspended sediment concentration e.g., a change of 100 mg/l for one month. The resultant light attenuation effects are addressed under turbidity, and the effects of rapid settling out of suspended sediment are addressed under smothering. Further details Evidence | No information | |||
Desiccation [Show more]Desiccation
EvidenceUmbonula lives in habitats that are in damp situations where it occurs on the lower shore suggesting that it would not survive desiccating conditions for very long. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Increase in emergence regime [Show more]Increase in emergence regimeBenchmark. A one hour change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of one year. Further details EvidenceUmbonula lives in habitats that are in damp situations where it occurs on the lower shore suggesting that it usually requires submerged conditions. Increased amounts of emergence in desiccating situations are likely to lead to mortality. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Decrease in emergence regime [Show more]Decrease in emergence regimeBenchmark. A one hour change in the time covered or not covered by the sea for a period of one year. Further details Evidence | No information | |||
Increase in water flow rate [Show more]Increase in water flow rateA change of two categories in water flow rate (view glossary) for 1 year, for example, from moderately strong (1-3 knots) to very weak (negligible). Further details EvidenceUmbonula thrives in habitats that are in areas of strong water movement and is not generally found in sheltered areas suggesting that a decrease in water flow rates where wave action is also weak would be likely to result in mortality most likely as a secondary effect from siltation but possibly reduction in food source. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Decrease in water flow rate [Show more]Decrease in water flow rateA change of two categories in water flow rate (view glossary) for 1 year, for example, from moderately strong (1-3 knots) to very weak (negligible). Further details Evidence | No information | |||
Increase in temperature [Show more]Increase in temperature
For intertidal species or communities, the range of temperatures includes the air temperature regime for that species or community. Further details EvidenceThe British Isles are at the centre of geographical range for Umbonula littoralis suggesting that colonies are likely to tolerate both warmer and colder conditions than those existing in Britain and Ireland. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Low | High | Low | Low |
Decrease in temperature [Show more]Decrease in temperature
For intertidal species or communities, the range of temperatures includes the air temperature regime for that species or community. Further details Evidence | No information | |||
Increase in turbidity [Show more]Increase in turbidity
EvidenceIncreased turbidity may reduce phytoplankton production and therefore reduce food availability except where increased turbidity results from a plankton bloom. | Low | High | Low | |
Decrease in turbidity [Show more]Decrease in turbidity
Evidence | No information | |||
Increase in wave exposure [Show more]Increase in wave exposureA change of two ranks on the wave exposure scale (view glossary) e.g., from Exposed to Extremely exposed for a period of one year. Further details EvidenceUmbonula thrives in habitats that are in areas of strong water movement and is not generally found in sheltered areas suggesting that a decrease in wave exposure where tidal streams are also weak would be likely to result in mortality most likely as a secondary effect from siltation but possibly reduction in food source. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Decrease in wave exposure [Show more]Decrease in wave exposureA change of two ranks on the wave exposure scale (view glossary) e.g., from Exposed to Extremely exposed for a period of one year. Further details Evidence | No information | |||
Noise [Show more]Noise
EvidenceUmbonula is unlikely to sense noise but may be sensitive to vibration. | Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | Moderate |
Visual presence [Show more]Visual presenceBenchmark. The continuous presence for one month of moving objects not naturally found in the marine environment (e.g., boats, machinery, and humans) within the visual envelope of the species or community under consideration. Further details EvidenceUmbonula may sense changes in light (shadowing) but has no visual organs. | Tolerant | Not relevant | Not sensitive | High |
Abrasion & physical disturbance [Show more]Abrasion & physical disturbanceBenchmark. Force equivalent to a standard scallop dredge landing on or being dragged across the organism. A single event is assumed for assessment. This factor includes mechanical interference, crushing, physical blows against, or rubbing and erosion of the organism or habitat of interest. Where trampling is relevant, the evidence and trampling intensity will be reported in the rationale. Further details. EvidenceUmbonula has a hard calcareous skeleton which is likely to be broken through contact with hard surfaces such as cobbles moving around during storms. However, small portions of the colony might survive in irregularities of the substratum and spread after abrasion has ceased. Encrusting bryozoans occupy the zone above bare rock on abraded surfaces where there is a zonation from bare to dense erect growths (authors observations). Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize and so recoverability is recorded as high. | Intermediate | High | Low | Moderate |
Displacement [Show more]DisplacementBenchmark. Removal of the organism from the substratum and displacement from its original position onto a suitable substratum. A single event is assumed for assessment. Further details EvidenceDisplacement of colonies off the substratum will result in mortality. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | High | High | Moderate | Low |
Chemical pressures
Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence / Confidence | |
Synthetic compound contamination [Show more]Synthetic compound contaminationSensitivity is assessed against the available evidence for the effects of contaminants on the species (or closely related species at low confidence) or community of interest. For example:
The evidence used is stated in the rationale. Where the assessment can be based on a known activity then this is stated. The tolerance to contaminants of species of interest will be included in the rationale when available; together with relevant supporting material. Further details. EvidenceInsufficientinformation. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Heavy metal contamination [Show more]Heavy metal contaminationEvidenceInsufficientinformation. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Hydrocarbon contamination [Show more]Hydrocarbon contaminationEvidenceRyland & DePutron (1998) observed no detectable damage to underboulder faunas affected by oil pollution in Watwick Bay, Pembrokeshire. These communities most likely included encrusting Bryozoa. However, it seems likely in the case of heavy pollution or pollution by light oils, damage may occur to encrusting bryozoans. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Intermediate | High | Low | Low |
Radionuclide contamination [Show more]Radionuclide contaminationEvidenceInsufficientinformation. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Changes in nutrient levels [Show more]Changes in nutrient levelsEvidenceInsufficientinformation. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Increase in salinity [Show more]Increase in salinity
EvidenceUmbonula littoralis appears to be restricted in distribution to areas that are continuously in full salinity conditions. It seems likely that variable or low salinity conditions will have an adverse effect. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | High | High | Moderate | Low |
Decrease in salinity [Show more]Decrease in salinity
Evidence | No information | |||
Changes in oxygenation [Show more]Changes in oxygenationBenchmark. Exposure to a dissolved oxygen concentration of 2 mg/l for one week. Further details. EvidenceUmbonula littoralis probably survives overgrowth by encrusting ascidians as described by Turner (1988) suggesting that it can survive isolation from easily obtained oxygen. Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | Low | High | Low |
Biological pressures
Use [show more] / [show less] to open/close text displayed
Intolerance | Recoverability | Sensitivity | Evidence / Confidence | |
Introduction of microbial pathogens/parasites [Show more]Introduction of microbial pathogens/parasitesBenchmark. Sensitivity can only be assessed relative to a known, named disease, likely to cause partial loss of a species population or community. Further details. EvidenceInsufficientinformation. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Introduction of non-native species [Show more]Introduction of non-native speciesSensitivity assessed against the likely effect of the introduction of alien or non-native species in Britain or Ireland. Further details. EvidenceInsufficientinformation. | No information | Not relevant | No information | Not relevant |
Extraction of this species [Show more]Extraction of this speciesBenchmark. Extraction removes 50% of the species or community from the area under consideration. Sensitivity will be assessed as 'intermediate'. The habitat remains intact or recovers rapidly. Any effects of the extraction process on the habitat itself are addressed under other factors, e.g. displacement, abrasion and physical disturbance, and substratum loss. Further details. EvidenceInsufficientinformation. | Not relevant | Not relevant | Not relevant | Not relevant |
Extraction of other species [Show more]Extraction of other speciesBenchmark. A species that is a required host or prey for the species under consideration (and assuming that no alternative host exists) or a keystone species in a biotope is removed. Any effects of the extraction process on the habitat itself are addressed under other factors, e.g. displacement, abrasion and physical disturbance, and substratum loss. Further details. EvidenceKelp harvesting is removal of substratum (see above). Larvae are produced annually and are likely to disperse from nearby unaffected substrata to recolonize. | High | High | Moderate | Low |
Additional information
Importance review
Policy/legislation
- no data -
Status
National (GB) importance | - | Global red list (IUCN) category | - |
Non-native
Parameter | Data |
---|---|
Native | - |
Origin | - |
Date Arrived | Not relevant |
Importance information
Oshurkovia (syn. Umbonula) littoralis is a characteristic species of the sublittoral fringe and of some biotopes.
Bibliography
Eggleston, D., 1969. Marine fauna of the Isle of Man: revised lists of phylum Entoprocta (=Kamptozoa) and phylum Ectoprocta(=Bryozoa). Report of the Marine Biology Station Port Erin, 81, 57-80.
Eggleston, D., 1972a. Patterns of reproduction in marine Ectoprocta off the Isle of Man. Journal of Natural History, 6, 31-38.
Hastings, A.B., 1944. Notes on Polyzoa (Bryozoa). I. Umbonula littoralis auctt: U. ovicellata, sp.n. and U. littoralis, sp.n.. Annals & Magazine of Natural History, Series 11, Vol. 11, 273-284
Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S. 1979. British ascophoran bryozoans. London: Academic Press.
JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee), 1999. Marine Environment Resource Mapping And Information Database (MERMAID): Marine Nature Conservation Review Survey Database. [on-line] http://www.jncc.gov.uk/mermaid
MBA (Marine Biological Association), 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.
Picton, B.E. & Costello, M.J., 1998. BioMar biotope viewer: a guide to marine habitats, fauna and flora of Britain and Ireland. [CD-ROM] Environmental Sciences Unit, Trinity College, Dublin.
Turner, S.J., 1988. Ecology of intertidal and sublittoral cryptic epifaunal assemblages. II. Non-lethal overgrowth of encrusting bryozoans by colonial tunicates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 115, 113-126.
Datasets
Centre for Environmental Data and Recording, 2018. Ulster Museum Marine Surveys of Northern Ireland Coastal Waters. Occurrence dataset https://www.nmni.com/CEDaR/CEDaR-Centre-for-Environmental-Data-and-Recording.aspx accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-25.
Environmental Records Information Centre North East, 2018. ERIC NE Combined dataset to 2017. Occurrence dataset: http://www.ericnortheast.org.ukl accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-09-38
Fenwick, 2018. Aphotomarine. Occurrence dataset http://www.aphotomarine.com/index.html Accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01
Kent Wildlife Trust, 2018. Biological survey of the intertidal chalk reefs between Folkestone Warren and Kingsdown, Kent 2009-2011. Occurrence dataset: https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01.
Kent Wildlife Trust, 2018. Kent Wildlife Trust Shoresearch Intertidal Survey 2004 onwards. Occurrence dataset: https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/ accessed via NBNAtlas.org on 2018-10-01.
Manx Biological Recording Partnership, 2022. Isle of Man historical wildlife records 1990 to 1994. Occurrence dataset:https://doi.org/10.15468/aru16v accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-09-27.
NBN (National Biodiversity Network) Atlas. Available from: https://www.nbnatlas.org.
OBIS (Ocean Biodiversity Information System), 2024. Global map of species distribution using gridded data. Available from: Ocean Biogeographic Information System. www.iobis.org. Accessed: 2024-12-27
Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, 2018. Yorkshire Wildlife Trust Shoresearch. Occurrence dataset: https://doi.org/10.15468/1nw3ch accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-10-02.
Citation
This review can be cited as:
Last Updated: 24/02/2005